It makes me correct because unless I’m mistaken, and of course I’m not, carrying out his action means the 2A is gone. The 2A would prevent it. If it cannot prevent, it cannot be said to exist.
You realize you are advocating gun control right?
The Second Amendment is clear that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. It does not “cease to exist” because certain politicians iterate desired structures/infringements upon it. Nor do such strictures by default indicate that cities have no need of the Second Amendment, or that the said politician thereby waives any and all need for the Second Amendment.