It is so sad.
Pamela Geller is a liberal. She is pro-abortion and pro-gay and still they turn on her for not going along on free speech and terrorism.
It’s actually rather interesting and bemusing. As Scalia would put it, almost refreshing.
I am surely not the first one who has wondered from first principles why the two groups have been in political bed with one another.
Pam’s position actually is more self consistent than the common liberal’s. She’s an honest libertine and she correctly identifies a would-be party pooper for that which is more extremist than almost any Christian would be.
I can by far more respect the honest libertine than the modern liberal, even though the libertine is headed for a sad life if she keeps it up. Her life may be wicked but it isn’t “nonsense.” We agree on why we disagree.
Do you know of a reliable source for this?