[corbe]

Why is ABC going after the Clintons, that is the series question? Obummer or pale_face Warren?

Who (and Why)is Hitlery being sabotaged by her hand feed press?

[UCANSEE2]

[Steely Tom]

This would be a bombshell, career ender if a Republican presidential candidate was in any way shape or form associated with it. The question would be never ending. Within a couple days, his campaign would be referred to as "troubled," and "controversial." No matter what explanations were offered, they would not stop the "controversy."

Silly, of course. It's the Clinton's we're talking about.

Say - for example - it was discovered that Meg Whitman's husband had been taken on the private jet of a known pedophile to an island hideaway where trysts with underage girls were routine, enjoyed by various very wealthy men.

Forget it. Instant deal over, instant investigations announced. The entire Republican primary race would be said to be "scandal-ridden" from that day forth.

But, as I said, we're talking about the Clinton's.

[Steely Tom]

Sorry about apostrophe violation. The plural of Clinton is “Clintons,” of course.

[HiTech RedNeck]

So that is their penance to the Clintons?

[randita]

It’s being reported now so ABC can claim they vetted the Clintons. But six months before the election, this story would never see the light of day.

[Intolerant in NJ]

Yes, yes - but look at all the good the Foundation does all over the world - why make an issue of a little thing like this when the big picture is all the benefits they give to so many people - the latest theme being used to defend the Clintons - what a racket - they take big money from all sorts of people and spread it around and they get the credit for all the good they do - h*ll give me some of that money and watch all the fine things I can accomplish.....

[KosmicKitty]

Clinton versus Kennedy

Old democratic aristocracy going after new democratic nouveau riche aristocracy.

Pass the popcorn, this is getting good.