Posted on 05/08/2015 3:37:23 AM PDT by Biggirl
Fox News Channel host Bill O’Reilly argued it is “bogus” to invoke freedom of speech in the debate over the Mohammed Art Exhibit and Contest on Thursday.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
“A moderate Muzzie is a radical Muzzie who hasn’t come to bat yet.”
You got that right. The only difference in a moderate and
radical jehadist is tactical advantage.
The female version of Brett Baier is Mygyn Kelly.
Pamela Geller's actions were the "fuse", the "bomb" was delivered by the superb shooting of a Texas traffic cop who delivered two head shots with his pistol.
The left considers her actions to be "incendiary" which is an overstatement as most sane people would consider them mildly amusing. We cannot expect to model our lives so as to avoid offending anyone we meet. If that were the standard we would have to mince our way through life as timid as a titmouse and live like a Canadian, Eh?
Regards,
GtG
Funny thing is reading “Killing Patton” and what he said
about the “Audacious General” is right the opposite of what
he says about Pamela Geller yet basically they did the same
thing. Spoke their mind and acted on what they rightfully
thought was the right thing to do.
Blow’Reilly is a hypocrite. Just a punk looking for
attention.
I saw Megan on with Bill when he basically said some of this same stuff. I seriously thought Megan was going to call him a pu**y on live TV. Somebody needs to do it.
I never knew Bill was muslim?
Pray America is waking
I totally agree with your tag line. It also illustrates one of my "pet peeves" which is the the lefty's corruption of perfectly good words, twisting their original meaning to suite their agenda.
There was a time when "being a man of discriminating tastes" was considered to be a high complement. The implication being one possessed a sophisticated appreciation for the finer things in life (friends, food, wine, music, literature, &C). Today's usage paints one as a bigoted, racist, narrow minded, misogynistic pig.
We can thank the lefty's twisting of meaning for the loss.
Regards,
GtG
Time to refill your medication O.really and try to get plenty of rest.
From Wikipedia: National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie
Purpose of the Case
In 1977 Frank Collin, the leader of National Socialist Party of America, announced the party's intention to march through Skokie, Illinois. In the predominantly Jewish community, one in six residents was a Holocaust survivor[citation needed]. Originally, the NSPA had planned a political rally in Marquette Park in Chicago; however the Chicago authorities blocked these plans by requiring the NSPA to post a public safety insurance bond and by banning political demonstrations in Marquette Park.
On behalf of the NSPA, the ACLU challenged the injunction issued by the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois that prohibited marchers at the proposed Skokie rally from wearing Nazi uniforms or displaying swastikas. The ACLU was represented by civil rights attorney Burton Joseph.[1][2] The challengers argued that the injunction violated the First Amendment rights of the marchers to express themselves.
Prior history
Both the Illinois Appellate Court and the Illinois Supreme Court refused to stay the injunction. The case was sent to the Supreme Court of the United States.[3]
On June 14, 1977, the Supreme Court ordered Illinois to hold a hearing on their ruling against the National Socialist Party of America, emphasizing that "if a State seeks to impose a restraint on First Amendment rights, it must provide strict procedural safeguards, including immediate appellate review... Absent such review, the State must instead allow a stay. The order of the Illinois Supreme Court constituted a denial of that right."[3] On remand, the Illinois Appellate Court eliminated the injunction against everything but the swastika. The Illinois Supreme Court heard the case again, focusing on the First Amendment implications of display of the swastika. Skokie attorneys argued that for Holocaust survivors, seeing the swastika was like being physically attacked.
The Illinois Supreme Court ruled that the use of the swastika is a symbolic form of free speech entitled to First Amendment protections and determined that the swastika itself did not constitute "fighting words." Its ruling allowed the National Socialist Party of America to march.[3]
Effect of the decision
In the summer of 1978, in response to the Supreme Court's decision, some Holocaust survivors set up a museum on the Main Street of Skokie to commemorate those who had died in the concentration camps. Ultimately the NSPA failed to carry through its march in Skokie. (Gaining permission in Chicago, they marched there instead).
-PJ
A philosophy that believes violence is an acceptable response to criticism is not a "faith."
Islam is a savage, blood-soaked, demon-possessed, pedophile-ridden, backward 7th-century murder cult. Personally I believe events such as Geller's should be commonplace; that way more of them can be smoked out and eliminated when their animalistic urges for blood kick in.
Yep, if we submit to this dictate of Sharia,
which ones will we not?
The ‘fairly unbalanced’ Loofa King doubles down on stupid.
Can you explain for the Court, please, the nature of the 'abuse?'
Megyn Kelly. Yes, she’s excellent, but by 9:00 PM I’m usually watching a movie. I can’t hack non-stop news.....mmm......well.....non-stop.
Exactly. It's not a religion in the sense we understand the word...and it's not a 'religion' to which I willingly submit.
BOR plays with fire and has not a clue. Of course, our world today dictates offense be defined subjectively, not objectively. "I am offended!" trumps "Over what?"
They ain't there now. They get to conform to the way things are done here...and if they find that unacceptable they can catch the first garbage scow back to the dump from which they escaped.
I saw the best explanation on FR...a radical says submit or have your head sawed off. A moderate thinks the same thing (won't say it) but wants the radical to do it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.