___________ the New York Times
NYT......the fourth estate equivalent of “she was just asking for it”. The hypocrisy of liberals is just truly astounding.
It’s too late for the Muslims to complain. We all know what Mohammed looked like now!
Personally, I have given up watching even bits and pieces of O'Reilly because of this incident. No big deal since those bits and pieces had already declined to just crumbs. But now the crumbs are gone.
LOL! The contest ended in 2 deaths!
The worst whitewashing job since The Adventure of Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn.
This from a paper that exercises bigotry and hatred towards Christianity and Conservatism posing as a blow for freedom on a daily basis.
Part of the big lie, the distraction, is the constant claim that terrorists are “upset,” “offended,” etc. That Pamela Geller should have known that the event would “inflame” somebody, that it was “pouring gasoline on the fire” (the Pope’s newspaper used that line), and that some “nutjobs” would come “unglued” and commit violence.
All these expressions are attempts to blame EMOTION for the attacks.
The attacks were carried out because of PRINCIPLE—the teaching of Islam.
The New York Times is a hate group. They exist to promote leftist ideas and to spew, promote, and spread hatred of all things conservative, especially if it is also christian. In the category of “the enemy of your enemy is your friend,” they love muslims right now. Make no mistake, they do not really love them. They just find them useful because muslims often target christians.
The Garland event wasn’t christians vs. muslims. I am only addressing that because the NYTimes thinks insulting Christ is fine but insulting Muhammad is over the top.
to the old gray whore, brothel tender for the presstitutes.....
the goal was not to strike a blow for free speech, the goal was to ridicule those that get their panties in a wad.
The arousal over free speech is collateral achievement
The great measure of success was two dead wackos
Similarly, the Assyrian and Akkadian empires were “asking for it” by creating sculptures offensive to Islam, thousands of years ago. I’m surprised that the Times didn’t scold the museum in Mosul for putting on display artifacts from the birthplace of civilization, which naturally infuriated ISIS into sledgehammering them into tiny fragments in February.