Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

None from first-ever group of female soldiers training to be Army Rangers advance through 1st round
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS ^ | May 9, 2015

Posted on 05/11/2015 7:03:26 AM PDT by KeyLargo

None from first-ever group of female soldiers training to be Army Rangers advance through first round: officials BY Rachelle Blidner

NEW YORK DAILY NEWS Saturday, May 9, 2015, 5:24 PM

The first-ever female soldiers allowed to train to be Army Rangers did not make it through the first round of the course, officials said Friday.

Eight women and 101 men who made it through the first tests of the 20-day Crawl Phase will have to try again to pass the last few at one of the toughest soldier training schools, officials said.

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: army; banglist; election; homosexualagenda; infantry; military; obama; politicalcorrectness; politics; rangers; recruitment; standards; strong; testing; tyranny; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: olepap
Who would win in a fight between the Battle Axe Squadron and the Homo Squadron?

The fairies would probably have air superiority.


21 posted on 05/11/2015 8:31:56 AM PDT by Iron Munro (We may be paranoid but that doesn't mean they aren't really after us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

It doesn’t matter that all the females did not make it to the next phase.

What matters is that they were there.

The Army leaders have already lost this fight. They lost it because of their arrogance.


22 posted on 05/11/2015 8:41:19 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
The Army leaders have already lost this fight. They lost it because of their arrogance.

I don't believe that the Army leaders have lost a thing. They are in fully support with the Administration goals and they are allowing the remaining eight to be recycled. If none of them make it through the rest of the course, then they will review the standards and adjust accordingly. The plan is on track. The losers will be a platoon of soldiers left in the lurch by a platoon leader who falls by the wayside when the chips are down.

23 posted on 05/11/2015 9:10:14 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
I don't believe that the Army leaders have lost a thing.

But leadership.

If this is not true given the hussein administrations purging of our military, than if demonstrated otherwise, I would be more than happy to concede.

24 posted on 05/11/2015 9:18:17 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

Long list. See all at link.

List Of Military Elite Purged And Fired Under Obama, Compiled By General Paul Vallely, 3-17-14
Posted on November 14, 2014 by Jean

Source: Rense.com
Thanks to S.

Here is the list of our military elite who have been purged or fired under Obama:
Commanding Generals fired:

· General John R. Allen-U.S. Marines Commander International Security Assistance Force [ISAF] (Nov 2012)
· Major General Ralph Baker (2 Star)-U.S. Army Commander of the Combined Joint Task Force Horn in Africa (April 2013)
· Major General Michael Carey (2 Star)-U.S. Air Force Commander of the 20th US Air Force in charge of 9,600 people and 450 Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (Oct 2013)
· Colonel James Christmas-U.S. Marines Commander 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit & Commander Special-Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force Crisis Response Unit (July 2013)
· Major General Peter Fuller-U.S. Army Commander in Afghanistan (May 2011)
· Major General Charles M.M. Gurganus-U.S. Marine Corps Regional Commander of SW and I Marine Expeditionary Force in Afghanistan (Oct 2013)
· General Carter F. Ham-U.S. Army African Command (Oct 2013)
· Lieutenant General David H. Huntoon (3 Star), Jr.-U.S. Army 58th Superintendent of the US Military Academy at West Point, NY (2013)
· Command Sergeant Major Don B Jordan-U.S. Army 143rd Expeditionary Sustainment Command (suspended Oct 2013)
· General James Mattis-U.S. Marines Chief of CentCom (May 2013)
· Colonel Daren Margolin-U.S. Marine in charge of Quantico’s Security Battalion (Oct 2013)
· General Stanley McChrystal-U.S. Army Commander Afghanistan (June 2010)
· General David D. McKiernan-U.S. Army Commander Afghanistan (2009)
· General David Petraeus-Director of CIA from September 2011 to November 2012 & U.S. Army Commander International Security Assistance Force [ISAF] and Commander U.S. Forces Afghanistan [USFOR-A] (Nov 2012)
· Brigadier General Bryan Roberts-U.S. Army Commander 2nd Brigade (May 2013)
· Major General Gregg A. Sturdevant-U.S. Marine Corps Director of Strategic Planning and Policy for the U.S. Pacific Command & Commander of Aviation Wing at Camp Bastion, Afghanistan (Sept 2013)
· Colonel Eric Tilley-U.S. Army Commander of Garrison Japan (Nov 2013)
· Brigadier General Bryan Wampler-U.S. Army Commanding General of 143rd Expeditionary Sustainment Command of the 1st Theater Sustainment Command [TSC] (suspended Oct 2013)

Commanding Admirals fired:
· Rear Admiral Charles Gaouette-U.S. Navy Commander John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group Three (Oct 2012)
· Vice Admiral Tim Giardina(3 Star, demoted to 2 Star)-U.S. Navy Deputy Commander of the US Strategic Command, Commander of the Submarine Group Trident, Submarine Group 9 and Submarine Group 10 (Oct 2013)

Read all at: https://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2014/11/14/list-of-military-elite-purged-and-fired-under-obama-compiled-by-general-paul-vallely-3-17-14/


25 posted on 05/11/2015 9:28:46 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

I hope that President Cruz has that list to use as the starting point for a “committee” to recommend/oversee reforms to the military... including a new list of people to fire.


26 posted on 05/11/2015 9:37:57 AM PDT by csivils
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

On the purge, it’s a myth, nothing but nonsense.

But, the senior leaders of all the services are supporting the Administration’s policies. They may not agree privately and they may (or likely not)be disagreeing behind closed doors, but publicly they are executing the orders that they have received from their political masters. The fact that no a single senior leader of all of the services has not resigned in protest of the social policies or the defense policies. They have complained about the budget changes, but that’s also on orders from above as the Administration does not like the Congress’ Sequestration effort.

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs has already said that if women are unable to pass these selected courses, then the leadership will be required to review the standards with a view to adjust them so that women can succeed. That has been the consistent trend since women were integrated into the main line of the military in the mid 70’s.


27 posted on 05/11/2015 9:44:03 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

The list is baloney, thick sliced. It has been debunked over and over. First step is to remove all officers that retired at about the time they would have expected to do so. Second step, remove all of those who had zipper problems. Third, remove all Command Sergeants Major/CPO/SMSGT and Major, these are not “senior leaders”. Finally, take off all Skippers who parked their warships on the beach or on a reef and what left is pretty thin gruel.

Certainly, the Administration sacked a handful of senior guys who locked horns with one or another with someone in the power structure. The Generals usually lose in these power struggles and nothing has been much different from times in past.


28 posted on 05/11/2015 10:17:46 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: central_va
I lift a heavy log every time i urinate.

You piss'en under a big dead log? Don't drop it on your foot.

29 posted on 05/11/2015 10:25:05 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Exterminate the terrorist savages, everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Then By jiminy we've got to lower the standards.
Isn't that what this is all about?
The military equivalent of an Ivy League affirmative action degree?
30 posted on 05/11/2015 10:54:12 AM PDT by Amagi (Lenin: "Socialized Medicine is the Keystone to the Arch of the Socialist State.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Brother
No problem. Just drop the standards.

Yeah, the standards are just a misogynistic cultural construct - like gravity.

31 posted on 05/11/2015 1:10:02 PM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

Chances are that there are actual exceptional women who could, but who choose not to sign up for various other reasons. My guess is that the percentage would be pretty small as it is.


32 posted on 05/11/2015 1:50:43 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Just heard through a male student in this class that not one of the females passed their leadership roles on patrols and that they couldn’t keep up in the swamps at Darby, creating extra effort on male students. Equipment that females were carrying had to routinely be passed to male students just so patrols could get to their objectives.


33 posted on 05/29/2015 12:41:50 PM PDT by TADSLOS (A Ted Cruz Happy Warrior! GO TED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

I assume such news will be banned by the media and Obama.


34 posted on 05/29/2015 12:53:34 PM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
The Ranger Training Brigade instructors obviously need re-education on enabling the rangerettes. /s

Basically the females failed twice. Leadership failure and lack of motivation via lack of physical strength and endurance. Any male student exhibiting the same would be summarily booted from the course.

35 posted on 05/29/2015 1:51:44 PM PDT by TADSLOS (A Ted Cruz Happy Warrior! GO TED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson