Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bert
You may be right.

There may be "misinformation" circulating around this agreement.

The cure for that is to publish the full details of the plan.

48 posted on 05/12/2015 11:15:52 AM PDT by Eric Pode of Croydon (I wish someone would tell me what "diddy wah diddy" means.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Eric Pode of Croydon

It was plainly stated on recent TV by a number of officials from previous administrations involved in past trade negotiations that the need for secrecy outweighs the public need to know. Such negotiations have always been confidential.

I can accept that especially knowing that the public could not understand the various points at various stages of ongoing negotiations.


56 posted on 05/12/2015 12:24:49 PM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson