Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives say marriage has always been between a man and a woman. They’re wrong.
The Washington Post ^ | May 13, 2015 | Trevor Burrus

Posted on 05/13/2015 10:48:49 AM PDT by EveningStar

Trevor Burrus is a research fellow at the Cato Institute’s Center for Constitutional Studies.


... Marriage is a constantly changing social institution that adapts to social and economic conditions. And when those conditions change, marriage changes.

Our modern view of marriage — one that has generally predominated in Western societies over the past 200 years — is the outlier. Historically, marriage has been about finding good in-laws and securing economic advantage. And marrying for love is a thoroughly modern invention ...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catoinstitute; history; homosexualagenda; marriage; samesexmarriage; trevorburrus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: Yosemitest

Oops. answr = answer


41 posted on 05/13/2015 11:16:37 AM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

No “modern invention” to it.

What IS “modern” is that marriage has been separated from the function of procreating and raising children. And it is not even a NEW “modern” take on marriage. The Romans of the Imperial Age were well into the various forms of “non-traditional marriage” arrangements, all without the benefit of divine blessing. It was not uncommon for, say, a patrician Roman to marry his horse, or take multiple wives, or even an exclusive homosexual relationship. For the lower levels of society, trying to emulate these fanciful versions of “marriage” was just too expensive and rarely indulged in.

The pagan tribes within the Roman Empire, as a matter of course, did pair off as man and woman, as this was the most efficient economic unit that could be formed below the clan and tribal level. Had just about nothing to do with “divine” or “moral” standards. Or even “love”, for that matter.


42 posted on 05/13/2015 11:17:25 AM PDT by alloysteel ("Before I refuse to take your questions, I have an opening statement..." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David
insert “and a woman” between the word man and the colon.

There should always be a woman between a man and his colon (unless he has a semi-colon, but I digress...)

43 posted on 05/13/2015 11:19:20 AM PDT by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: chajin

Or between the man and another man’s colon.


44 posted on 05/13/2015 11:26:53 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

There may have been myriad reasons in history for a man and a woman to marry, love being just one of many. But the institution of marriage — between a man and a woman — has not changed. No successful civilization has encouraged the sexual congress of same-sex couples, let alone elevated that perversion to the status of marriage.


45 posted on 05/13/2015 11:27:57 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Is the writer a sodomite?


46 posted on 05/13/2015 11:31:00 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

“Marriage is a constantly changing social institution...”

Socialists have long made this wrong assumption, based on a corruption of marriage, the dowry.

The truth is that marriage is a *biological* construct that humans innovated, that is far superior to what animals use.

That is, male animals have the prerogative to spread their DNA among many females. Female animals have the double prerogative to get the best male sperm donors (for more than a single offspring), *and* (at least some of them) to have a male present as a provider to *exclusively* help her raise her offspring.

The trouble begins when there is more than a few males around, so the best sperm donor is likely also not the best provider.

Marriage is a great idea to provide the best outcome to the man and woman, in exchange for monogamy, and the best provision for their offspring. As a biological system it is a brilliant idea.

However, it can be fouled up by the dowry, because the male is likely *not* the best sperm donor, even if they are a more capable provider. And the bond between the couple is financial, not monogamous. Which risks the prosperity of their offspring.


47 posted on 05/13/2015 11:34:21 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder

Considering the ultimate tyranny that was ancient rome..

the author is probably a close personal friend of Caeser Obie from Nairobi....


48 posted on 05/13/2015 11:34:33 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Disgusting. Cato Institute should be ashamed.


49 posted on 05/13/2015 11:36:03 AM PDT by mulligan (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Don't know, and don't care.
The quicker WE ALL OBEY GOD, the better.
50 posted on 05/13/2015 11:36:17 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

New-Bruce, are you a pooftah?

51 posted on 05/13/2015 11:37:55 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: max americana

General Copyright Statement:
Most of the sourced material posted to Free Republic is posted according to the “fair use” doctrine of copyright law for non-commercial news reporting, education and discussion purposes. We used to post full text of most articles so we could document history as it’s being made, but more and more news agencies are now requesting us to post excerpts and links only to their material, and some are requesting that we post no material at all from their sites. We are complying with all such requests. Click here : http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1111944/posts
for the latest list of copyright requests. Please send takedown requests to: jimrob@psnw.com


52 posted on 05/13/2015 11:41:36 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

yeah yeah yeah....we know that Bedouin herders in Biblical times had scores of wives. Still the exception and not the rule.


53 posted on 05/13/2015 11:46:17 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

All of that might be true, but bottom line, the marriage was between a man and “A” woman

The king of France never sent off to Austria for a Prince to cement relations between the countries while thwarting the power of a German king.

The “A” might be considered wrong because in many societies one man might have more than one wife, but each of those transactions is a single marriage


54 posted on 05/13/2015 11:47:54 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

That’s alright! It gave me a chance to express my opinion.


55 posted on 05/13/2015 11:48:52 AM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

The Gay-to Institute went homo a couple of years ago.


56 posted on 05/13/2015 11:54:17 AM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

It is s mental disorder with at least half trying to kill themselves.


57 posted on 05/13/2015 11:56:43 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest; EveningStar
But... would you say that we should kill homosexuals?

Would you answer that question?

58 posted on 05/13/2015 11:59:27 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (She'd a been a good woman if it'd been somebody there to shoot her every day of her life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

This article is a farce.


59 posted on 05/13/2015 12:00:44 PM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
Jesus Christ already has answered that question.
Am I more correct than He ?
60 posted on 05/13/2015 12:03:41 PM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson