You mean aside from the constant bleating of the media?
IMO, it would be easy to manipulate a volatile and suggestible person to do the bidding of someone who gains their trust. Could be via the internet, it would not have to be in person. (I still am convinced that the Sandy Hook shooter was manipulated in this way and that’s why he shot his hard drive before heading out to shoot children. I think his “handler” told him to do that in order to destroy the evidence. Why else would someone bent on shooting people stop first and shoot his computer?)
I do not know what was going on with that guy in particular, but like you I am open to the idea some of these shooters are being manipulated for purpose.
Is there some sort of a gun agenda behind the manipulation? I don’t know.
There are sick people out there. Some of them are obviously wing-nuts. So some of them do go postal on their own. I don’t want to avoid that reality.
I still think that some of these shootings are just too convenient.
Anti-gun legislation is being considered. All of a sudden there’s a big gun incident. Seems I’ve seen this happen enough times for it to click with me. Then again, I may have selective or faulty memory too.
Have you noticed this? Have others, or am I the only one who sees it like this?
I also believe many of these people are under psychiatric care. If they are, why are they going postal anyway? It seems as if someone is seriously miscalculating the threat of these people.
I also question if some of the new medications that have come out over the last ten years, and particularly the last five, seem to have some way crazy side effects. They warn about higher levels of suicide. What about higher levels of mass murder?
Are the folks getting some of these medications 100 times more likely to think of killing a large group of people?
Something is sure going on, and I don’t think it’s the water.
Random thoughts: