The Jindal argument is that his executive order enforces the Constitution; Obama’s are unconstitutional or anti-constitutional.
It is my contention that ANY Executive Orders are imperious by nature and while not expressed in my response, I believe Jindal is guilty of the same. The end does not justify the means. Nevertheless, 50 state governors can play Obama’s game just as thousands of faceless bureaucrats have been doing with their edicts for many many decades.