Why his little sister...what about his 16 year old sister who suggested it??...
Incest is sexual intercourse between persons closely related...not sexual curiosity...
He is the oldest child. If this happened when he was 14 the ages of the 4 oldest sisters (at this time) were 12,10,9 and 8.
I doubt the 9 and 8 year old were curious.
Why his little sister...what about his 16 year old sister who suggested it??...
Josh is the oldest of the Duggars children; he is now 27 years old. The next oldest child is the daughter Jana (and her twin brother) who is now 24. If Josh Duggar first molested one of his sisters at the age of 14, who exactly is the 16 year old sister who suggested it of whom you speak?
If he physically molested them and they were unwilling participants...I agree....
I guess his sleeping sisters, especially the 8 and 9 year olds were just asking for it / s And even if the younger sisters were willing participants which it certainly doesnt sound as if they were since at least one of them went to her parents about it would that would make it OK?
However, kids play I'll show you mine if you'll show me yours all the time.
This doesnt sound at all like a case of I'll show you mine if you'll show me yours or taking a curious peak at a naked sibling. However copping feels, including putting his hand up the nightgowns of his younger sisters and foundling their genitals and foundling their breasts is not curiosity - that is molestation.
Incest is sexual intercourse between persons closely related...not sexual curiosity...
So you fall into the Bill Clinton school of - if there was no penile penetration, then it wasnt really sex-sex?