Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wall Street Costs The Economy 2% Of GDP Each Year
Forbes ^ | 31-MAY-2015 | Steve Denning

Posted on 05/31/2015 9:26:06 AM PDT by dila813

“Wall Street is back,” says the New York Times, and the economic cost is high. The excessive financialization of the US economy reduces the GDP by 2% every year, according to a new study by International Monetary Fund. That’s a massive drag on the economy–some $320 billion per year. Wall Street has thus become, not just a moral problem with rampant illegality and outlandish compensation of executives and traders: Wall Street is a macro-economic problem of the first order.

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: Maryland; US: Massachusetts; US: New York; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: 2016election; akadeblasio; berniesanders; clintoncash; clintonfoundation; cromnibus; doddfrank; economy; election2016; elizabethwarren; fauxahontas; forbes; hillaryclinton; hitlery; lieawatha; martinomalley; maryland; massachusetts; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; obama; obamarecession; obamataxhikes; occupywallstreet; pages; peterschweizer; stevedenning; thekycandidate; vermont
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
Dodd-Frank ping, very good constructed argument by Steve Denning regarding our too big to fail banks and our overly complex regulations dragging down the economy.
1 posted on 05/31/2015 9:26:06 AM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dila813

When you count all the free traitor legislation Wall Street has been pushing for years..... I would say those parasites have killed the US economy by about 30%. When you count all the manufacturing jobs sent to China Asia etc

This was the doing of Wall Street, the scum bag politicians in DC that they bribe and so on.


2 posted on 05/31/2015 9:30:29 AM PDT by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dila813
Or the change could come from courageous political leadership to call corruption corruption, to recognize felons as felons and to treat organizations responsible for criminal conduct accordingly.

The Uni-Party isn't going to do that. We can talk about Dennis Hastert -- precisely because he is insignificant. But Hillary? Boehner? Reid? These people are untouchable, and so are their friends.

3 posted on 05/31/2015 9:32:36 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Claire Wolfe should check her watch. It's time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I am going to go with which ever candidate will call for the break up of the too big to fail banks and the pull back of the regulations killing the economy.

Right now, I have Walker and Cruz; but I will aggressively work for a candidate that shows leadership on this issue.


4 posted on 05/31/2015 9:34:51 AM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dila813

Bump


5 posted on 05/31/2015 9:36:52 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dila813

Who is Steve Denning? Why should I care about someone whining about “outlandish compensation of executives?”

Whenever I hear someone do that, my leftist Bullsqueeze detector pings in the red.


6 posted on 05/31/2015 9:41:07 AM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dila813

“I am going to go with which ever candidate will call for the break up of the too big to fail banks and the pull back of the regulations killing the economy.”

+1


7 posted on 05/31/2015 9:42:02 AM PDT by NRx (An unrepentant champion of the old order and determined foe of damnable Whiggery in all its forms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dila813

Are we to believe that profits generated from financial speculation somehow evaporate and do not feed back into the economy?


8 posted on 05/31/2015 9:46:11 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

That’s not the point, did you read the article?

The point of the article is that these institutions aren’t allowed to fail. Excessive regulation and the backing of the government causes inefficiencies.


9 posted on 05/31/2015 9:51:16 AM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

You don’t have to agree with everything a man says to be able to understand that we are engaging in wall street welfare.


10 posted on 05/31/2015 9:52:44 AM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dila813

whoa! This very subject was discussed here on good ol FR many yrs ago. We need a freed up economy and new tax system. Fair tax is best IMHO but a combo of flat and fair may be ok.


11 posted on 05/31/2015 9:54:52 AM PDT by rrrod (Just an old guy with a gun in his pocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Are we to believe that profits generated from financial speculation somehow evaporate and do not feed back into the economy?

If the use of the financial instruments in question work to velocity of capital moving through the economy, then they could very well be a significant drag on the overall economy.

12 posted on 05/31/2015 9:55:28 AM PDT by Sparticus (Tar and feathers for the next dumb@ss Republican that uses the word bipartisanship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dila813

what is the cost on the economy of the last 6 years of government regulations and ObamaCare? Wall Str. is peanuts by comparison, me thinks.


13 posted on 05/31/2015 9:57:16 AM PDT by llevrok (To liberals, Treason Is the New Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx

For later


14 posted on 05/31/2015 9:59:46 AM PDT by NRx (An unrepentant champion of the old order and determined foe of damnable Whiggery in all its forms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Article is about government regulations impact on Wall Street.


15 posted on 05/31/2015 10:01:43 AM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dila813

Wall Street.

Wall Street ?

Bankers and Brokers that Glass-Steagall had once separated for a reason.

No more.

The Fed needs them to sell their bonds at increasingly lower yields and the bankers will make damn sure they don’t lose money in the process.


16 posted on 05/31/2015 10:03:10 AM PDT by Zeneta (Thoughts in time and out of season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dila813
What would you give to see an honest editorial piece from the NYT that said this instead:

"“Big government is back,” says the New York Times, and the economic cost is high. The excessive regulation and taxation on the US economy reduces the GDP by 2% every year, according to a new study by International Monetary Fund. That’s a massive drag on the economy–some $320 billion per year. Big government has thus become, not just a moral problem with rampant illegality and outlandish compensation of career-bureaucrats and political cronies: Excessive government is a macro-economic problem of the first order."

17 posted on 05/31/2015 10:04:11 AM PDT by Be Free (I believe in gun control. The more people that control their own guns, the safer we'll all be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeneta

The author of the article is calling for the pull back of complex regulations, Dowd-Frank, and the implementation of simple transparent regulations.

The complex regulations are favoring the too big to fail mega banks.


18 posted on 05/31/2015 10:05:28 AM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Be Free

IMF lead by the government devotes would never say that.

This IMF study is the closest thing to honesty you are going to get out of an organization like this.


19 posted on 05/31/2015 10:07:18 AM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sparticus

Is that to say that the money is so busy being turned into profits — that it doesn’t have time to do anything else?

(Dumb question, I know. But I’m not exactly the sharpest crayon in the tool shed.)


20 posted on 05/31/2015 10:08:07 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson