Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A nail-biter in the House for Fast Track trade authority
americanthinker.com ^ | 6/8/15 | Rick Moran

Posted on 06/08/2015 4:44:40 PM PDT by cotton1706

Republicans in the House are saying that they are confident they have the votes to deliver Fast Track trade authority to the president when a vote is held sometime later this week.

But outside observers say that the issue is still very much in doubt, and that a coalition of protectionist Republicans, libertarians, and far-left liberal Democrats may yet prevent the measure from passing.

Politico:

Congressional sources estimate the pool of undecided members at just over a dozen lawmakers — mostly Democrats torn between supporting Obama’s quest for a historic Pacific Rim trade deal and traditional party backers like labor unions, who have turned the TPA vote into a litmus test for deciding whether to support incumbents heading into 2016.

Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Wisconsin Rep. Ron Kind, the lead Democrat whipping for the legislation, need at least 217 members to support the deal for it to pass, though congressional sources say both sides want 220 to 225 “yes” votes lined up to avoid the possibility that any one lawmaker could be tagged with casting the deciding vote. So far, more than 18 Democrats have publicly committed to supporting the legislation.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections
If we can defeat their latest scheme, they will go apoplectic!!
1 posted on 06/08/2015 4:44:40 PM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
If we can defeat their latest scheme, they will go apoplectic!!

Didn't Cruz vote for it in the Senate? Why are we against it in the House?

2 posted on 06/08/2015 4:47:31 PM PDT by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Pro-America reps will vote against it until a job impact study reveals who benefits other than Wall Street. Pro-World Reps will continue to sell out American industry.


3 posted on 06/08/2015 4:49:01 PM PDT by ex-snook (To conquer use Jesus, not bombs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Let’s all line up to give Barack HUSSEIN Obama Soetoro dictatorial power over international relations.

Funny, don’t recall Boner and Ditch running on that a few months back.


4 posted on 06/08/2015 4:52:21 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck

“Didn’t Cruz vote for it in the Senate? Why are we against it in the House?”

Cruz voted for TPA, trade promotion authority. And he did so because he wants to be president and wants the same leverage Obama wants over the congress, the authority to negotiate deals without the input of the Congress.

Cruz is naïve. Because once TPA is passed, then TPP (the actual deal) will be rammed through, will all sorts of odious provisions, that the congress will be unable to amend, thanks to TPA.

Just because Cruz votes FOR something doesn’t mean it’s a good thing!


5 posted on 06/08/2015 5:01:16 PM PDT by cotton1706 (ThisRepublic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Do not vote ANYTHING for the O-man. Do not give him anything he wants. What is wrong with them?


6 posted on 06/08/2015 5:17:46 PM PDT by bboop (does not suffer fools gladly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Obamatrade is something to destroy the GOP and get Dems elected and then the whole pile of crap starts all over again , LOL


7 posted on 06/08/2015 5:34:04 PM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

I’ve been seeing and hearing pro-TPA commercials lately. Good sign?


8 posted on 06/08/2015 5:37:02 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck

Didn’t Cruz vote for it in the Senate? Why are we against it in the House?
******************************************************************************************************
So Cruz can get the changes he wants to the Senate version. Here’s hoping that the despicable, in-the-pocket-of-the-lobbyists Boehner and his lacks can’t pull this one off.


9 posted on 06/08/2015 6:51:47 PM PDT by House Atreides (CRUZ or lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

This is not a nail biter. Whoever said that is selling Kool-Aid. Signed, sealed, and delivered for the real beneficiaries of American Government, not us.


10 posted on 06/08/2015 8:10:27 PM PDT by stillfree? (had it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706; All

What is wrong with all you Congress critters? Go ahead an pass it. You have to pass it to find out what’s in it. That’s the Pelosi way. Can’t you trust Nancy Pelosi and your President? I mean, hell, look how well Obamacare worked out for us.


11 posted on 06/08/2015 9:18:25 PM PDT by Din Maker (2016 Campaign Slogan: "If you like Obama, you'll love Hillary.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706; All

Just because Cruz votes FOR something doesn’t mean it’s a good thing!
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

I was disappointed that Cruz voted for it. But, that’s the only “black mark” on his resume at this time. I’m still for him, but I’m very disappointed.


12 posted on 06/08/2015 9:20:57 PM PDT by Din Maker (2016 Campaign Slogan: "If you like Obama, you'll love Hillary.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

All of his amendments were defeated. Him and CFR wife are having a good laugh though at the rubes.


13 posted on 06/08/2015 9:34:51 PM PDT by sunrise_sunset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sunrise_sunset

All of his amendments were defeated. Him and CFR wife are having a good laugh though at the rubes.
********************************************************************************************************
You may want to rethink just who the “rubes” are. You do realize that if the Boehner version is defeated the Senate version is essentially dead. If “they” (Boehner, McConnell, etc.) then still want trade deal legislation, the only way they would realistically get it then (by picking up rebellious conservative votes in the House) would be to amend it in the way that Cruz wanted.

Say hello to the other Rubes who lack understanding of what Cruz was attempting. He still may succeed...at least I hope so. The battles against the progressives is never-ending.


14 posted on 06/08/2015 10:07:32 PM PDT by House Atreides (CRUZ or lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Ill keep calling & emailing.


15 posted on 06/09/2015 4:13:25 AM PDT by rrrod (Just an old guy with a gun in his pocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

It’ll pass, the commie is using his backroom strong arm tactics to get his latest Marxist utopian wetdream passed so he can take down the country for good. All with the help of the GOPe.


16 posted on 06/09/2015 4:53:11 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker

It seems he is having second thoughts. He came out against the TPP until a thorough reading can be had by legal consultants and congress. A day late and a dollar short IMHO, but at least a light bulb went off. On principle no secret legislation (aside from national security) shoul be considered ever. The government is owned by “we the people” ostensibly.


17 posted on 06/09/2015 5:00:41 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Republicans eager as always to cede their authority to the other side. Can’t wait to give Obama fast track authority. What’s wrong with that picture?


18 posted on 06/09/2015 8:31:24 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson