Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is for the "Cruz is for TPA, but might not vote for TPP" crowd. Two months ago he was singing a different tune. No, he never said "I love TPP in its current form" but he certainly makes it clear that TPP and other agreements are the goal. To suggest otherwise now is disingenuous on his part.
1 posted on 06/13/2015 6:16:20 AM PDT by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: GIdget2004

In theory PTA offers US trade advantages, in practice it never happens.


2 posted on 06/13/2015 6:18:30 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Has Obama done anything that is good for America and Americans? If not, why would he start now? I’m in favor of smaller trade agreements and letting the public in on them while they’re being negotiated. I see no need for secrecy, especially from “the most transparent administration ever.”

We have negotiated away our sovereignty and control over our own shores with the GATT and other agreements. We get taken to a foreign court and we seem to always lose. Then per the agreement our trading partners get to punish us until we comply.


3 posted on 06/13/2015 6:21:21 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

I read where Bonehead personally recruited Cruz, to help Lyin Ryan write this *Op-Ed*.


4 posted on 06/13/2015 6:21:33 AM PDT by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

TPA reduces Congress’ power over trade.

So, this is a lie from the headline.

Yes, Paul Ryan and Ted Cruz conspired to LIE to you.

Cruz told us that TPA contained dangerous immigration powers and that he could not vote for it.

Cruz offered an amendment to “fix” the dangerous immigration powers.

Cruz’s amendment failed to win support.

So, Cruz voted for TPA anyway.

Cruz supporters can try to spin and obfuscate. They can try to shift the focus to other candidates.

But the fact remains that Ted Cruz sold us out and went back on his own word.

That does not mean I would not support Cruz for POTUS. But it certainly means he will not get my support for the nomination.


5 posted on 06/13/2015 6:22:33 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (President Walker - Attorney General Cruz (enforcing immigration laws for real))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004
I like what Ted Cruz was saying but I was leery of his strong support for vastly increasing H-1b visas (500%? Really Ted?).. The TPA/TPP cluster has opened my eyes to the corporatist side of Ted Cruz.

http://www.cruz.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=137

6 posted on 06/13/2015 6:32:27 AM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Paul and Ted, thank you for taking time out of your busy privileged day to make the case for the TPP / TPA trade agreement to we little people.
Funny how you and your fellow elites refused to do that before the vote on your secret trade scheme that would cede national sovereign control over immigration and pharmaceutical regulation to foreign governments and multinational corporations.
You should know you are duty bound to disclose all details of legislation / trade agreements that you vote for, (except those rare ones critical to national security).
After this last disgraceful move you made to pass-the-bill-in-order-to-find-whats-in-it, you republicans that voted for TPP / TPA, have breached our trust.
You no longer serve our interests, and no longer deserve to be in office.
FU RINOS


10 posted on 06/13/2015 6:40:30 AM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

bfl


12 posted on 06/13/2015 6:54:37 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("They say what's up is down, they say what isn't, is, they put ideas in his head he thought were his)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Cruz seems to be doubling down.


16 posted on 06/13/2015 7:06:45 AM PDT by FR_addict (Boehner needs to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

I understand the bill has some good stuff, but any “process” which gives the POTUS an advantage, an opportunity to continue his nefarious work deconstructing the nation, must not pass. I do not, Americans do not trust him, not a bit. Save it for 2017.


21 posted on 06/13/2015 7:20:20 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

The House should never authorize the formation of a new international commission that will regulate not only trade, but immigration, labor, environmental, and all manner of commercial policy.

None of us voted last year for this kind of legislation. It’s about time our Congress put the country’s own citizens ahead of their own greed.


26 posted on 06/13/2015 7:32:26 AM PDT by SatinDoll (A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS BORN IN THE US OF US CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Listening to these guys prognosticate about how good it is going to be when this pile of secret horsepuckey is adopted/passed, or whatever new procedure they want to use to ram it down our throats, is laughable. If it is so great then why the heck can’t we see it?

I was with Cruz but now he can pound sand. I don’t care how smart he is, or whether he truly believes this is a great trade path forward. It is aiding and abetting the serial liar that is currently POTUS, and that alone should be enough to sh-tcan it.


29 posted on 06/13/2015 7:42:35 AM PDT by franmor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Congress has repeatedly failed to act to make Obama accountable on any issue. Cruz is either tone deaf or insincere if he can justify any act that gives any authority to the office of the president.
The democrats are so much more politically astute as to get all the credit for stopping the deal and then making the republicans responsible for it’s complete failure when it passes.
The republicans had the same potential with Obamacare, but were sold out by their leadership. Pelosi screws Bohner again!


30 posted on 06/13/2015 8:11:58 AM PDT by Steamburg (Other people's money is the only language a politician respects)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

IF IT IS SO GOOD, THEN MAKE IT PUBLIC!!!


#MakeItPublic
31 posted on 06/13/2015 8:11:59 AM PDT by jimjohn (You don't get the kind of government you want, or the kind you need. You get the kind you deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

The Senate version of TPA includes TAA which cuts an additional $750,000,000 from Medicare on top of the $500,000,000 Democrats cut from Medicare to pay for Obamacare.

Medicare is already underfunded and the underfunding gets worse as the babyboomers turn 65.

A vote for TPA with TAA included is a vote against Medicare. It also gives Democrats cover for the Obamacare cuts to Medicare.

TPA should not pass until TAA is removed.


32 posted on 06/13/2015 8:31:17 AM PDT by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

CRITICAL error by Cruz on this. Getting the stench of Paul Ryan on him will take a tremendous amount of effort to wash off.

He needs to quickly and distinctly elaborate to conservatives what in the hell he is doing here.


33 posted on 06/13/2015 8:33:38 AM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Hillary - Ethically sleazy and politically stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

I’ll stick with Sessions, who does not have an election agenda and a need to appeal to big donors. An advantage of coming from a small state.


36 posted on 06/13/2015 8:50:55 AM PDT by sunrise_sunset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

This issue is very simple to understand. If Obama is for it, then it is certainly bad for America. All you need to know.


41 posted on 06/13/2015 9:27:24 AM PDT by KyCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Right. Vote for a Senator. If Cruz really wanted to be President, he should have started by publically resigning from and repudiating that sewer.


43 posted on 06/13/2015 9:59:44 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

This looks like it explains the trade deals better than anything else but unfortunately, you can’t read the whole thing without subscribing to WSJ! Guess I’ll have to keep looking for better explanations somewhere else.


52 posted on 06/13/2015 10:45:52 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004; Kale; Jarhead9297; COUNTrecount; notaliberal; DoughtyOne; MountainDad; aposiopetic; ...
    Ted Cruz Ping!

    If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
    Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!

    CRUZ or LOSE!

56 posted on 06/14/2015 8:46:51 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson