Anyone who believes Polls has never studied how to lie with statistics! ‘Nuff said.
The people who are saying that Hillary is leading all of the presidential polls are the same ones who are telling us that our unemployment rate is below six percent. Food for thought.
Actually stepping up and FIGHTING can change circumstances. Or, the candidate can just campaign like it is 1955.
$6,000,000,000 is “lost” in the State Department while she is the Secretary of State?
No investigation? No punishment?
Let a Soldier lose a government blanket and watch what happens.
She “loses” $6,000,000,000 of American taxpayer money and then runs for President?
She should be in prison or selling slurpees to pay off her debt.
$6,000,000,000 is “lost” in the State Department while she is the Secretary of State?
No investigation? No punishment?
Let a Soldier lose a government blanket and watch what happens.
She “loses” $6,000,000,000 of American taxpayer money and then runs for President?
She should be in prison or selling slurpees to pay off her debt.
It’s June, of the year BEFORE the election, it’s 6 months plus till the damn Iowa caucus. Chill out.
Slight to moderate leads for she of the 100% name recognition Hillary today are meaningless. Slight leads for Jeb in NATIONAL primary polls 6 months before Iowa where no one thinks he’ll win are meaningless.
I think Walker will be the nominee and the President.
People aren't going to switch sides if the "other side" can't be trusted to make things better.
National polls need to weighted to reflect Electoral College votes and most if
not all aren’t. Thus the results reflect only a random sample of the general public.
Clinton is so far ahead of her opponents that she’ll coast into the democratnomination
without any real competition. The GOP will be much closer until at least the Mar. 1,
round of primaries. Then the GOP field will begin to narrow rapidly,
JMO.
Eight years ago Mike Huckabee was ahead in the polls.
Keep reading up on those polls. Meanwhile I’ll continue to monitor the grassroots intensity which is now over the top for Ted Cruz.
And folks here take me to task for not voting in national elections.
I could see a solid workman-like populist GOP campaign being able to take advantage of a flaky Hillary campaign. She’s a globalist, an America-centric Republican could beat her.
Tagline....
Any article written now predicting winners is nuts. From now till November 2016 is several political lifetimes.
Care to look up how many polls Carter led Reagan in back in 1980?
Polls also indicate that strong conservatives makeup only 10% of the Republican voters. A large part of Freepers are a part of that strong conservative base. Our outlook who has a chance to win in the primaries is probably skewed.
She “leads” but only by the slimmest of margins. Only a few months ago, the hag was ahead of all opponents by double digits. Hag can’t even poll over 50% now and the only thing sustaining her is name recognition. We’re still 17 months out from the 2016 general election.. what the numbers show now will be a distant memory then. And where does the author come up with the idea Dauphin Bush is going to be the GOP nominee?
In trying so hard to make polling “Fair”, Real Clear Politics has succeeded in distorting polls. And that’s not the only thing wrong with taking polls.
Polls are for sheeple.
Our election system is compromised. The elites pick and choose who will be the nominees and the winner beforehand then they hold the faux elections. Hopefully somebody, anybody will expose all this but I won’t hold my breath. Maybe Donald Trump, but I don’t know. Everyone in Washington seems to be in on it. After all the hell, all the corruption, all the deaths, rioting, racial tensions, do you *honestly* think the majority of Americans want another far left radical like Hitlery in the White House? Hell no. This poll stuff is all fake just like the election. The elites have already decided who the two nominees will be: Jeb and Hitlery and Hitlery will be given the crown.
Sure ‘The Old Hag’ leads, right into the toilet......