Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Supreme Court Issues and Opinions - 9:30am EDT (SCOTUS Blog to start at 9am) 6-25-15
SCoTUS Blog ^

Posted on 06/25/2015 3:41:45 AM PDT by Perdogg

US Supreme Court Issues and Opinions - 9:30am EDT (SCOTUS Blog to start at 9am) 6-25-15


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; obamacare; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-207 next last
To: xzins

Just as long as we can start unwinding it.


61 posted on 06/25/2015 6:54:34 AM PDT by Principled (Government Slowdown using the budget process!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: xzins

5 min buzzer sounded


62 posted on 06/25/2015 6:54:57 AM PDT by BlueNgold (Have we crossed the line from Govt. in righteous fear of the People - to a People in fear of Govt??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

Nervous. The same sex ruling is far more crucial to the future of this nation than the obamacare ruling, in my opinion.


63 posted on 06/25/2015 6:57:26 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray for their victory or quit saying you support our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Agreed.


64 posted on 06/25/2015 6:58:24 AM PDT by hoagy62 (Only one solution left.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

should be out by now...


65 posted on 06/25/2015 7:00:31 AM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: hondact200

First up is Texas Housing...Kennedy as expected...5-4 to affirm.


66 posted on 06/25/2015 7:01:16 AM PDT by HoosierWordsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xzins

First opinion: Texas housing discrimination. 5-4. Kennedy has the opinion. Remanded.


67 posted on 06/25/2015 7:01:21 AM PDT by hoagy62 (Only one solution left.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

explain for us non legal laymen please- good or bad? thanks


68 posted on 06/25/2015 7:01:59 AM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I think we’d adapt to same sex ruling if unfavorable. We’d invent a new union - a union blessed by God - a new name too. “God’s Marriage” or some similar name.

Since we obviously won’t accept that our “marriage” is the same as theirs, we will absolutely just come up with a new vehicle to identify ourselves. States will behave as they wish with the new union.

0care is one I’m more concerned with. Gotta begin unwrapping that monster.


69 posted on 06/25/2015 7:02:24 AM PDT by Principled (Government Slowdown using the budget process!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

The issue in this case is whether the Fair Housing Act allows lawsuits based on disparate impact – that is, an allegation that a law or practice has a discriminatory effect, even if it wasn’t based on a discriminatory purpose. The Court had granted review to consider this question in two earlier cases, but both of those cases settled before the Court could rule on them. - from the SCOTUS Blog.


70 posted on 06/25/2015 7:03:00 AM PDT by hoagy62 (Only one solution left.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: LS
Not long, I fear since "the issue is never the issue."


71 posted on 06/25/2015 7:03:20 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

Libs win!


72 posted on 06/25/2015 7:03:53 AM PDT by HoosierWordsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Principled

There have already been comments that Holy Matrimony fits that bill.


73 posted on 06/25/2015 7:05:27 AM PDT by NCjim (Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: HoosierWordsmith

Pretty much.


74 posted on 06/25/2015 7:05:45 AM PDT by hoagy62 (Only one solution left.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Principled
"I think we’d adapt to same sex ruling if unfavorable. We’d invent a new union - a union blessed by God - a new name too. “God’s Marriage” or some similar name."

I think that is too optimistic. I think the government will move against churches and sermons that uphold traditional marriage and will start opening churches to lawsuits, revocation of tax exempt status and legal charges of hate speech.

75 posted on 06/25/2015 7:06:01 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

We know the fixes are in


76 posted on 06/25/2015 7:06:37 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

You are exactly right.


77 posted on 06/25/2015 7:06:40 AM PDT by Shadowfax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

Very bad ruling. Will allow HUD under Obama to force the issue of Section 8 housing in upscale suburban neighborhoods because the “disparate impact” makes them mostly white.


78 posted on 06/25/2015 7:06:47 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Subsidies upheld, Roberts majority. (Twitter)


79 posted on 06/25/2015 7:07:45 AM PDT by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Decision of the Fourth Circuit is affirmed in King v. Burwell. 6-3.


80 posted on 06/25/2015 7:07:50 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-207 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson