Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

From October 13, 2014 -- Gov. Scott Walker's administration will accept June same-sex marriage
Jason Stein Blogs Milwaukee Wisconsin Journal Sentinel ^ | October 13, 2014 | Jason Stein

Posted on 06/26/2015 10:45:52 AM PDT by MN_Mike

The rougly 500 same-sex couples who married in June will have their partnerships recognized by the state of Wisconsin and couples will be able to amend past tax returns, Gov. Scott Walker's administration ordered Monday.

(Excerpt) Read more at jsonline.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: gay; marriage; surrendermonkey; walker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 06/26/2015 10:45:52 AM PDT by MN_Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MN_Mike
“Severely Conservative.”
2 posted on 06/26/2015 10:48:49 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MN_Mike

It’s out of his hands. He cannot do anything else............


3 posted on 06/26/2015 10:48:50 AM PDT by Red Badger (Man builds a ship in a bottle. God builds a universe in the palm of His hand.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MN_Mike

Personally I’d like to see a “ Now let them enforce it” answer but those were permanently eliminated by the 16th and 17th amendments.

Rick Snyder is also saying we will accept it here in Michigan.


4 posted on 06/26/2015 10:49:23 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Sad fact, most people just want a candidate to tell them what they want to hear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

10th Amendment doesn’t apply?


5 posted on 06/26/2015 10:49:57 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
It’s out of his hands. He cannot do anything else............

Exactly so.

6 posted on 06/26/2015 10:50:51 AM PDT by Johnny Navarone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

Nope.


7 posted on 06/26/2015 10:52:42 AM PDT by Red Badger (Man builds a ship in a bottle. God builds a universe in the palm of His hand.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Personally I’d like to see a “ Now let them enforce it” answer but those were permanently eliminated by the 16th and 17th amendments.

An immoral law does not bind. It is absolutely null and void from the outset, I don't give a rat's rear what justification or precedent you want to attach to it.

This acquiescence, right here, will be the death of the Republican party.

And good riddance, in my opinion.

8 posted on 06/26/2015 10:54:12 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rarestia
Except in increasingly rare instances and by increasingly rare exceptional individuals (and I'm not sure one exists today), even "conservative" politicians place political expedience over defense of the Constitution and of conservative principles.

The self-described "conservatives" we have today defend the Constitution and traditional American values only when it's convenient to do so -- that is, when it doesn't take too much time from their primary goal of amassing power.

9 posted on 06/26/2015 10:55:16 AM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MN_Mike

10 posted on 06/26/2015 10:56:22 AM PDT by Bluewater2015 (There are no coincidences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No....that’s a little harsh IMO. This is couple hours old.

So I’m willing to wait and see how Walker plays this out over the long run. He’s earned that in the past six years.


11 posted on 06/26/2015 10:56:29 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Navarone

Smart to get beyond this and onto more important issues


12 posted on 06/26/2015 10:59:04 AM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Scott says there should be an constitutional amendment.

He is only about 3 weeks late...

“Protect Marriage from Courts Act” — June 8, 2015
http://www.cruz.senate.gov/.../20150423_Protect...


13 posted on 06/26/2015 11:00:31 AM PDT by MN_Mike (Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

President Andrew Jackson:

“John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!”


14 posted on 06/26/2015 11:01:13 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
It’s out of his hands. He cannot do anything else..

What ever happened to 'civil disobedience'? Why is it that 9 people have such power? I don't think the founders had this in mind way back when.

15 posted on 06/26/2015 11:01:37 AM PDT by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

This is only the beginning.

“This point was illustrated by an appalling yet predictable admission from Solicitor General Donald Verrilli in response to a line of questioning by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Sam Alito during oral arguments in April. Roberts asked Verrilli if a religious school that has on-campus housing for married couples would be required to afford such housing to same-sex couples, given that the pro-gay marriage side wants the Court to invent a fundamental constitutional right. Verrilli refused to give a straight answer. Then when Alito followed up and asked him if private schools that oppose gay marriage would lose their tax-exempt status, he admitted, “it’s certainly going to be an issue. I don’t deny that.”

https://www.conservativereview.com/Commentary/2015/06/Cruz-Lee-move-to-defend-marriage-and-religious-liberty


16 posted on 06/26/2015 11:02:12 AM PDT by MN_Mike (Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Parmy

Cop out


17 posted on 06/26/2015 11:03:10 AM PDT by MN_Mike (Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MN_Mike

IN support of Cruz, who is my first choice, you have made the same mistake made by a lot of Walker supporters (he is my second choice) - in not understanding that as a Senator and a governor, these two men have different responsibilities and different avenues of attack available to them.


18 posted on 06/26/2015 11:04:49 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Parmy
"Why is it that 9 people have such power?"

When you give the government power over something they take total control of it.

Government got control of marriage totally when government was allowed to perform marriages and give out financial goodies based on marriage status.

19 posted on 06/26/2015 11:05:02 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
Smart to get beyond this and onto more important issues

Got that right.

20 posted on 06/26/2015 11:05:49 AM PDT by Johnny Navarone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson