Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dilbert San Diego; kvanbrunt2

“I wonder if a movement could start for states to pass laws, in which they don’t recognize marriage at all.

There is no federal marriage license. Anyone who has ever gotten married has gotten married subject to state laws, not federal laws.”

“The states could refuse to issue marriage licenses now that the feds have taken it over.”

I have been thinking the same thing.

Usually, when the federal government creates legislation, it creates the means to engage the legislation. In this case, legislation has been created from the supreme (cough cough) court with no means to engage the legislation.

All that is needed to counteract this, is for the states to say ok we are no longer issuing licenses, performing civil ceremonies, etc. It is now for the federal government to do this. Oh, ooops. The legislation that was just created by the federal government through the supreme court doesn’t include all the necessary stuff for following the legislation? Too bad.


61 posted on 06/27/2015 9:57:34 AM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: ForYourChildren; Dilbert San Diego

“The states could refuse to issue marriage licenses now that the feds have taken it over.”

“I have been thinking the same thing.”

and the states can pass Man-Woman cohabitation licenses. Just change the name. If the feds want the word marriage let em have it. we just create our own until they corrupt that and so on.


71 posted on 06/27/2015 11:55:57 AM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone all iCommentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson