Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai

The SCOTUS decision does not apply to the states! A mandate that gay-marriage licenses be issued “by the States” clearly means those licenses shall be issued by the Federal Government (a precedent set by last week’s ObamaCare decision).


17 posted on 06/28/2015 4:40:20 PM PDT by kevao (Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kevao

Good point. Real good point.


18 posted on 06/28/2015 4:43:23 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: kevao

Good point. Real good point.


19 posted on 06/28/2015 4:44:05 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: kevao
ROTFL. Dish it right back at them. Clearly, SCOTUS could not have intended the states to act against the will of the people who inhabit those states ...

Pull a Roberts right back at them.

23 posted on 06/28/2015 4:51:12 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: kevao

kevao wrote:

“The SCOTUS decision does not apply to the states! A mandate that gay-marriage licenses be issued “by the States” clearly means those licenses shall be issued by the Federal Government (a precedent set by last week’s ObamaCare decision).”

OK, I think I see what you are getting at..

If I read it right, you applied the SCOTUS’ obamacare definition of ‘state’ to the “gay marriage” decision.

If so, where would those “couples” go in order to get said licenses?

DC?

A federal building in one of the states?


36 posted on 06/28/2015 5:31:03 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: kevao; jeffersondem; Amendment10; WildHighlander57

I have been thinking the same thing.

Usually, when the federal government creates legislation, it creates the means to engage the legislation. In this case, legislation has been created from the supreme (cough cough) court with no means to engage the legislation.

All that is needed to counteract this, is for the states to say ok we are no longer issuing licenses, performing civil ceremonies, etc. It is now for the federal government to do this. Oh, ooops. The legislation that was just created by the federal government through the supreme court doesn’t include all the necessary stuff for following the legislation? Too bad.


43 posted on 06/28/2015 7:15:56 PM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson