Treason from Deck to Deck, Keel to PooP Deck... on the Ship of State..
that's not even counting the sedition and espionage..
CURE!..
CWII
Off with their heads!
Treason has been committed by those who foisted their personal opinions upon the U.S. They have given aid and comfort to the enemy: those who will not abide by the law.
There is no “law of the land” there is only a Judicial Putsch.
If it is necessary to suggest that the sun rose this morning.
Loving v. Virginia didn’t challenge the institution of marriage in any way, it removed limitations on heterosexual marriage that were rather absurd. The current case redefined the meaning of marriage so as to make it meaningless.
it is not treason to ask Congress to use its constitutional powers to limit the purview of the courts
(Sad) Bottom line; the issue is settled law. The Supreme Court sometimes reverses lower courts. It does not reverse itself.
Even worse, Obama thinks he is on a roll.
His next two (highly illegal/improper) Executive Actions may be to try to give voting rights to everyone in the US who (supposedly) pays taxes, etc;, i.e. all the illegal (democrat-voting) immigrants. Citizenship would not matter. They would not have to establish IRS compliance either. The fact that they paid sales tax when they bought their latest 6-pack of Corona would be enough for the Dems.
Next, free by Presidential pardon, all the (Black) drug dealers who pleaded down their serious felony drug dealing charges to drug possession misdemeanors, because the “system is so unfair to poor minor amount drug users.”
It’s coming.
Don’t you love how the Left is suddenly in love with the concept of Treason?
Seems like only yesterday that “ dissent is the highest form of patriotism”...
that's not even counting the sedition and espionage..
CURE!..CWII
SCOTUS isn’t the only one that has trouble with words. Civil disobedience is not treason.
And lighting the White House up in a Rainbow pattern was not dividing the nation ? Saying that religious views are gonna have to change was not dividing the nation ? Your Obama Unicorn is not pooping skittles.
He's an idiot, and so's his editor.
You don't "infer into" anything. You infer from something.
But composition skills aside....he's still an idiot.
Washington DC is awash in crony capitalism and the average person is a helpless pawn in their game. Our Republic is a joke.
That was a long and torturous screed that essentially said the The Constitution of The United States does not say what it says and at the same time demonized those few justices that wanted to uphold the Constitution.
As an aside I have no idea why Chief Justice Roberts would come down on the side of Obama Care that he upheld and is in plain direct and simple violation of its written law relative to the state mandates to receive federal subsidies. The law was written as such to make the states take the subsides and enact obamacare. When they wrote the law they never thought that most states would reject the subsidy. Most did and that would destroy Obamacare.
Twice Chief Justice Roberts saved Obamacare, by making a fee a tax and by making the word state mean Federal State. This is not an interpretation of law that was in conjecture nor vague nor obscure. This was a political edict not based on law or language but political intent that each and every justice knew was not a constitutional act.
The dissenting opinion of Scalia is epic. In effect he has deemed the Supreme Court of the United States no longer a legitimate arm of the United States government.
Most do not realize but what Justice Scalia wrote is a call to arms.
“God Save the Republic”
I don’t know about the rest of you, but “jiggery-pokery” is now my new favorite word.
Ok i dont get it...
First the daily beast says the dissenting scotus judges and the elected officials that shredded the upholding judges are committing treason.
Then they say that “Chief Justice Roberts (joined by Scalia and Thomas) makes a solid,and unsurprising,substantive case.”
Which is it?
Treason or solid substantive case?
Anybody up for a little Civil Disobedience?
Now, move along, nothing to see here.
State Religion created, no big deal, move along, nothing to see here.
The dissenters said pretty much what Lincoln said about the Dred Scott decision.
He also has no clue about what constitutes treason under the Constitution. This is the first time I’ve heard anyone suggest that disagreeing or even refusing to obey a Supreme Court decision should be considered treason.
Obviously, some of the things one might do in opposition could in theory be treasonous.