Posted on 07/01/2015 11:52:35 AM PDT by lbryce
“...Clinton, on Twitter, posted that she was “especially proud” of that figure.””
I could.. but wont do much extrapolation.... on that somewhat careless statement...
Just shows how stupid and ignorant are the voters/donors.
$43.9 million from credit cards in Nigeria
> “The Clinton campaign official said that 91% of the donations came from people giving $100 or less.”
There could be some trickery here. And knowing just how degraded and corrupt the Clinton’s are, there’s a very good chance of trickery in this report.
First, we know that the June 30 FEC filing deadline is viewed as a huge publicity event. So it’s not a stretch to think candidates will do everything in any way to put lipstick on their pigs.
So I look at the statement above without having researched the report which I don’t think is yet public and I ask the question what does “91% of the donations” mean?
Does it mean 91% of the donors? Or does it mean 91% of the 45 million?
Because if it means 91% of the donors, then that’s a deceptive report which is par for the course for the Clintons.
Let’s say it’s 91% of the 45 million, roughly 41 million. If the average donation was $50, then that translates to roughly 820,000 people which is well within the democrat machine’s capabilities to churn out.
I am not that impressed.
One thing I am also not impressed with is the republicans. Their whole game against Clinton is to make her look corrupt and crooked, which of course she is. But they don’t understand that such volleys only solidify her following who excuse Clinton for everything because it’s all just politics. The way you defeat Clinton is to ignore her and let her fall into her own holes. Does anyone remember the “Healthcare Express” of the Clinton years?
Clinton is really not so smart. She is only made to look smart when stupid republicans accuse her 24/7 of all manner of things to see what sticks. Whether true or not, Clinton just stands there while her supporters respond that it’s all just politics. As Clinton overcomes each allegation true or not because it didn’t stick because each allegation was politically motivated, she wins because stupid republicans were not successful in taking her down. Thus, because she is still standing, then republicans are stupid so therefore she looks smart, in the eyes of her supporters. Circular logic but logic is not relevant here.
Ignore Clinton! Hillary who? Let the press ratchet up the Hillary idolization. Ignore it. Liberals hate it when people ignore them.
Clinton wins when she gets attention, any attention.
***************************************************************
Senator Cruz! Hillary Clinton said blah blah blah today, what’s your response?
Hillary who? Look people in this country are hurting because of the lawlessness of this president, people have lost their health insurance, their jobs or they can only work part-time; businesses can’t create jobs because of many obstacles that the Obama people have put in their way.
But Senator Cruz Hillary is saying yada yada yada, surely you have something to say about that?
Look we have an out of control federal government, we have a Supreme Court that legislates and we have 18 trillions dollars in debt. And we are a laughingstock around the world in foreign policy.
But Senator Cruz!
Sorry I have a meeting to attend now.
You sir! What did you think of Hillarys statements today?
Hillary who?
***************************************************************
Hillary thrives on notoriety, on having insults thrown at her. She smiles and beams when republicans get bent out of shape at her blatant deception and corruption. And they can do nothing about it because it’s all just politics!
But should the grassroots get behind a candidate like Ted Cruz and ignore Clinton, then she loses face because she’s not notorious, she’s not the center of attention.
45 million for Hillary?
Hillary who?
Good. They won’t feel so generous when she drops out - again.
yep, you are right....on all of that.
Rubio super pac running ads against the Iran deal on FOX news during Hannity and on KRLA and KEIB here in Los Angeles.
Nails it. All of this is smoke and mirrors to make it appear she's "popular."
Candidate Obama pulled the same trick...said he was "so popular" he raised a billion dollars...said he was the first candidate to do so. Only problem.....later in his campaign he was forced to borrow money....no word on what he did with the billion.
================================================
REFERENCE 6/30 NY POST---Clinton seeks $1 donations as fundraising deadline advances---Hillary's campaign is soliciting as little as a $1 donation – to highlight her grassroots support. “Can you contribute $1 right now to help hit our goal of 50,000 donations?” implores a campaign email.
Who're they kidding----they need numbers just to stay in the race.
CAMPAIGN AGIT-PROP She’s emphasizing grassroots donations to showcase the populist message of her new campaign. “You really want to focus on building for the long term and not just getting as much money as soon as possible,” a former 2008 Clinton campaign adviser, said. “I’m confident she’ll have the resources she needs to run an effective campaign.”
(waiting for hysterical laughter to die down)
Hillary Clinton-the best candidate money can buy.
Bill was recently spotted in Paris-----looks like he's globe-trotting----prolly visiting their secret offshore accounts and wire-transferring big bucks to Hillary to use in her campaign.
The question to ask again and again is;
"Who are the people that have given her $45MILLION and why are they investing so much in giving her control of our government?"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.