The key word here is "yet".
Now it has begun. Why not? Love is Love the tolerant liberals say. Love is not just for 1 person. Also since it is not mention in the 10 Commandments like Whoopi said, there should be no problem. /s
jk
Are marriage licenses public records?
Having multiple wives sounds nutty, but not nearly as nutty as connecting an organ with a sterile channel designed to discharge semen and urine with one designed to discharge poop.
Only the left can take a beautiful and sacred rite as marriage and turn it into an absolute POS. Why do we keep thinking we can cooperate and find common ground with those people?
If they divorce him, will each get half, leaving him with nothing?
"Oh no. Now what? Now what? What do we do now?"
We warned America this would happen if the homos got to play "married". Everyone and everything will want to play "married."
Can't wait for people to start marrying their pets.
Hey, this isn't our fault. We tried to stop it. The democrats did this.
Hey, they’re right, just ask Kennedy!
Apres Obergefell, le deluge!
Well, this will be interesting.
There’s really no way to legally deny this, given the SC ruling, imo.
I want to hear the logic for whatever is decided.
I suspect that it will be denied, though.
When a Muslim man comes here with his three wives there’s no problem. They all get welfare, housing, medical care, EBT, etc.
So why can’t a citizen enjoy the same rights as a Muslim immigrant?
Hey, why not?
Yep. Equality, diversity, inclusiveness, tolerance. Who are we to decide who people should love.
That's hard to argue against now. The left and SCOTUS made these rules.
Marriage used to recognize that only one male and one female can grow a family. Now that an unnatural, sterile homosexual pair can “marry”, why not polygamy? At least they can produce children.
It also has far more historical precedent among major religions (Islam), early Mormonism, the Old Testament, non-western cultures, and throughout the animal kingdom.
Nice job Kennedy, POS
I can see some wealthy individuals marrying their children in order to avoid estate taxes. They SC actually devalued “marriage” with their baloney about love and self-esteem into a mere contract.
Love wins x 2. Anyone who opposes this is a hater bigot creep who should be spit on and ridiculed.
Just wait till Mitt is in office..../s
Now if each of the wives gets to marry two men...
Polygamy makes more sense than “gay” marriage, but it is still not a union that is conducive to providing a stable home life for children. It’s all so stupid.
..tick.. tick..tick.. tick..tick.. tick..tick.. tick..tick.. tick..tick.. tick..tick.. tick..tick.. tick..tick.. tick