Cruz’ big trick... he debates objectively not subjectively and is able to fact check the interviewer or opponents’ sources firmly and instantly sighting sources.
The MSM always rely on springing opinion as fact from questionable sources, then act offended and indignant when their sources are questioned - which is why the rebuttal must be firm and accurate - Ted does this in his sleep.
The Katie Couric interview was a perfect example.
She asserted the NASA, 97% of climate scientists and even the Pope (yea, the Pope) believe in climate change why not you Ted? Ted sighted the report she was quoting from had been discredited - Katie out of reflex started to defend the report but then as quickly backed away. Ted made Katie look like the fraud she is.
I want to like Ted but he threw me with his TPA position... it was all for it with some lame made up junk that could have just as easily come from the white hut and then he does not vote for it.
I wonder, based on that display, what his real convictions are?
"cited" = "used as reference"
~~~~~~~~~~~
Not picking on you; you're not alone, by a long shot...