Posted on 07/10/2015 11:30:45 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus
Joe Arpaios acknowledgment in a radio interview last weekend that he is still investigating President Obamas birth certificate has prompted a question from people who continue to follow the controversy.
What ever happened to the universe-shattering revelation promised by the sheriffs lead investigator, Mike Zullo, in late 2013?
Reached by telephone, Zullo told WND in an interview his Cold Case Posse team commissioned by the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office must resolve three legal issues before the new evidence can be revealed regarding the validity of the document posted online by the White House in 2011 as Obamas birth certificate and a subsequent investigation of its origin.
Weve cleared two, and the last one is problematic, Zullo said of the legal hurdles.
If we cant clear it, it may preclude this information from ever reaching the light of day. It may prevent me from ever disclosing what this is. But it does not mean we are not cultivating new evidence.
Zullo explained that when he said in 2013 he was preparing to release the information, he anticipated we were going to have these answers within weeks.
As this was progressing, the legal issues started coming up, and its just put everything on hold, he said.
A racial-profiling legal judgment against Arpaio and a subsequent, ongoing civil contempt case against the sheriff that has taken a bizarre turn have only made it more difficult, Zullo said.
But he insists the document posted by the White House in April 2011 is fraudulent.
There are some very serious problems with that pdf file, he told WND. Thats not an issue.
Maybe he was born here, maybe not, he said of the president. That question has never been the focal point of our investigation. He may very well have been born here. Who knows?
(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.wnd.com ...
What I know of the Fantasywriter brand of conservatism comes only from what you actually write. It does not come from one individual post of yours but the cumulative sum of posts of your views.
Shuck and jive. You didn’t mention my prior posts. You cited one post, and one post specifically. Your childish jibe re my post 150 sounded ridiculous, and in fact IS ridiculous.
So now you will dissemble and pretend the post you clearly and specifically mentioned is not what you were talking about.
Pathetic.
Too ignorant a post to warrant a serious response.
Projection.
Sad.
“Oh ye of little faith.......”
Faith? Faith ran out 4 years ago. Poop or get off the pot.
WHAT HAPPENED TO THIS UNIVERSE SHATTERING NEWS?
No one knows for 100% certain but it appears that a con man from Seattle named Dennis Montgomery duped Maricopa County, Arizona Sheriif Joe Arpaio and Sheriff Arpaio’s “Cold Case Posse” investigator Mike Zullo into believing that he (Montgomery) could produce that “Universe-Shattering Information.”
The Sheriff shouldn’t feel too bad, it turns out that Montgomery had conned the CIA out of hundreds of thousands of dollars with phony “investigations.”
The following is from an Arizona Republic newspaper article: “U.S. District Judge Murray Snow cracked open the window to the voluminous and bizarre investigations of Dennis Montgomery, a Seattle man Arpaio’s office hired as a confidential informant.
Montgomery made a name for himself as an alleged con artist after he convinced the CIA that he was able to decode secret al-Qaida messages shortly after the 9/11 attacks.
Arpaio confirmed his office’s transactions with Montgomery in a bombshell contempt of court hearing last month, but provided few and vague details about the scope of Montgomery’s work.”
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2015/05/14/judge-spotlights-arpaios-seattle-operation/27338029/
If you’d like to read more:
http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/arpaio-incriminates-self-during-contempt-trial-7710306
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.