t doesn't matter what you think. If it disagrees with us, you're finished. They make it plain in all of these very public efforts they make of destroying people. The new totalitarian is terrifying because it means that for a fair number of people in what's supposed to be a democracy, winning simply isn't enough. They are not really trying to capture something as pedestrian as political equality nor are they satisfied that if they get it. They're not really seeking a win in the courts or a legal solution. Those are all just merit badges to be collected along the way to a more important goal and that is you will agree and you will love them and you will believe them and you will support them and you will recant your dissent. And we're going to keep pounding you until you do, and that is what is happening.
Must Read: The New Totalitarians
And again,
It doesn't matter that the couple found a way to get married. It doesn't matter the judge's refusal to marry them did not result in them not being able to get married. They were able to get married. Another judge came along and did it, this guy is going to be destroyed. The left will not quit until this guy is targeted and Alinsky'd out of the office. Just as we said yesterday: It's not enough that the judge here in this case lose. He must learn to love gay marriage, and he must learn to support it. Otherwise, he's finished.
African-American Judge Targeted for Destruction After Refusing to Marry Two Women
FYI, ping!
Go to hell, Komives.
Tell the gay to shove it.
I thought that the USSC ruling only required that states issue marriage licenses, not that every official MUST marry anyone who demands it.
Maybe that interpretation is wrong, but far more wrong is to compel any existing employee to perform duties that are morally repugnant to them, which duties were NEVER mentioned when they applied for (or were appointed to) their job. PERHAPS for new employees and appointees, if they sign a contract that specifically includes doing something that they otherwise wouldn’t, then they wouldn’t have a leg to stand on...but as things are now, I think that all existing government employees should get off the hook, just on that basis.
Which, of course, doesn’t even begin to touch the issue of the free exercise of religion, which is clearly being attacked here and which, if the judge in question loses his job, can only come as a result of government action.
I think the Advocate should resign from being gay.
This is surprising!
(In its mildness)
Most of the homo activists that I read are calling for imprisoning and/or execution of the “Monsters” who refuse to fully embrace their desires.
There needs to be a 1A freedom of religion lawsuit against the Obergefell ruling regarding forcing particular individuals to uphold it against their faith.
Up yours, Nick Komives.
Hmmmm. Isn’t the government promoting Satanism on this person????? I would NOT QUIT and I would STATE I am NOT practicing SATANISM!!!!
The government can NOT force a Religion on us-—and forcing the glorification of the irrational vice of sodomy on others-—is the promotion of the Worship of Ba’al, which equates Life to Excrement to specifically mock the Judeo-Christian God.
A true Justice system can NEVER promote Vice and sodomizing others is always a vice-—an irrational, unnatural dehumanizing use of the human body which removes purpose and meaning from the sex act.
"Homosexual" or even "giblets" (for the cult's GBLTs acronym) are the more descriptive (and accurate) terms to use (and those words anger all the "right" people -- the emotion-based bulllies of the cult!)
Do they say that government officials who refuse to enforce legitimate federal immigration laws should resign? I thought not. Why should those state officials who follow their state’s legislation and refuse to follow illegitimate decrees from the Supreme Court resign?
“They didn’t deserve to be humiliated; they didn’t deserve to be inconvenienced,” Komives told the Toledo Blade.
Yes they did, as does anyone who demands that their vice be called a virtue.
Nick Komives has a laughable work history: https://www.linkedin.com/pub/nick-komives/34/812/8a1
I don’t see why anyone needs to pay him any attention.
The undesirables must be identified and removed. They stink and are a blot on our progressive society. But, let’s do it legally. Then in the name of law, we can mark them, shut down their businesses, force them out of work, pack them up and ship them off to the camps so we don’t have to see them, and where work will set them free.
They don’t exist. What happens to them in the camps is irrelevant; as long as our progressive brave new world does not have to see them or acknowledge their existence or non-existence.
Earth to “gay advocate”.
Shove it up your smelly Obamahole.
You should already have directions.
Gay advocate needs to consult God and the Good News of Genesis 1.
Homosexuals, who have railed about intolerance regarding their views, now bully the convictions of others. Nice.
Well said, sir!
Ironic. That elected judge loses his position because of non-elected judges making laws rather than interpreting them. Checks and balances have fallen apart. Welcome to the new regime.