Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congresswoman in Tears Over Sale of Aborted Baby Body Parts “These are Babies for God’s Sake”
lifenews.com ^ | Jul 15, 2015 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 07/15/2015 9:56:59 PM PDT by Morgana

Congresswoman Martha Roby of Alabama had just one minute to make her point on the floor of the House of Representatives today but she broke down in tears as she spoke for the millions of Americans who are outraged by the expose’ of Planned Parenthood selling the body parts of aborted babies.

“This is one of those moments that — as a nation and as a people — we have to ask ourselves, ‘Who are we? Are we really going to tolerate this inhumanity?'” she asked, holding back tears. “Are we going to look the other way while babies are brutally killed and organs harvested for profit?'”

SIGN THE PETITION! Congress Must Investigate Planned Parenthood for Selling Aborted Baby Parts

Here’s more from Roby’s statement from the Washington Examiner and a video of it:

“The casual and callous way [the Planned Parenthood executive] details how babies can be killed in such a way that their tiny hearts, lungs and livers can be taken and sold for profit is simply horrifying.

“You know, we’ve been very good at getting heart, lung, liver, because we know that, so I’m not going to crush that part, I’m going to basically crush below, I’m going to crush above, and I’m going to see if I can get it all intact,” she says, describing how she alters the abortion procedure to best harvest whatever organs are in demand.

“These aren’t specimens! These are babies for goodness sake!” she exclaimed, her voice breaking.

“I may only have one minute today, but I promise we are not finished talking about this.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: abortion; alabama; bodyparts; martharoby; plannedparenthood; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: Sherman Logan

Sounds cold but logic is cold


41 posted on 07/16/2015 4:31:16 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Actually, my first thoughts were exactly your point. The poor little darlings have already been rejected and executed in what should be the safest place on earth, their souls returned to God and now people are going to be disturbed by selling body parts?


42 posted on 07/16/2015 4:41:46 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I wonder if she cried over Mitt Romney’s ownership interest in Stericycle

I’m impressed, this being FR and all, that it took 37 whole posts to peg Mitt Romney as being the villain of the piece...let’s see how long it is before Catholic voters are lassoed in as well...


43 posted on 07/16/2015 4:43:23 AM PDT by IrishBrigade (build)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Perhaps the doctor needs to be aborted


44 posted on 07/16/2015 4:44:31 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade

Can you explain any difference between Romney profiteering from broken baby bodies and Planned Parendhood doing the same?


45 posted on 07/16/2015 4:45:17 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Unjust laws are null and void. And court opinions aren't even laws. They're opinions. Ignore them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade

not voters, the pope


46 posted on 07/16/2015 4:45:26 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
On a scale of 1 to 10 of heinousness, if murder of an innocent baby is a 10, whatever you do with the body will at most qualify for a 2. It just isn't terribly important.

Selling baby parts leads to more baby murders.

47 posted on 07/16/2015 4:47:56 AM PDT by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet into FlixNet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Can you explain any difference between Romney profiteering from broken baby bodies and Planned Parendhood doing the same?

Not a big difference morally. However with the sale of parts the murderers get the money. With Romney's company he gets (some) money.

48 posted on 07/16/2015 4:50:11 AM PDT by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet into FlixNet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Why is everyone surprised at this?

When you elect Socialists you get Socialism...

Socialism will sacrifice the individual in the name of the party/government etc. ...

The Socialists believe these babies are being "repurposed" for the greater good...

This would have been against the law when we still had some Conservatives in the FEDGOV. Even the true Liberals like Moynihan would have not allowed this but now it is policy.

49 posted on 07/16/2015 4:51:59 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Can you explain any difference between Romney profiteering from broken baby bodies and Planned Parendhood doing the same?

Well, other than PP being the ones to actually do the deed, and Romney having a stake in a supplies company, along with a probable multitude of others, why, then, no, I don’t see a difference, no difference at all...


50 posted on 07/16/2015 5:01:56 AM PDT by IrishBrigade (build)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB
The creepy planned parenthood woman in the tape was so hung up on livers one wonders if she was having fava beans and Chianti.

That IS where I went. Limbaugh pointed out the lack of medical breakthroughs which begs the questioni, what are they really doing with these dead baby parts? I had to wonder about black robed pentagram wearing people and other crazies.

51 posted on 07/16/2015 5:09:28 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Of those born of women there is not risen one greater than John The Baptist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bert

not voters, the pope

His Bufoonishness may be many things, but I wasn’t aware he was actively employed by Planned Parenthood...


52 posted on 07/16/2015 5:10:11 AM PDT by IrishBrigade (build)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

The most dangerous place in the USA is the inside of a woman’s uterus.


53 posted on 07/16/2015 5:17:13 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

Man, you said a mouthful. Before the way of the Anti-Christ can be paved very much longer, America, as a symbol of good to the World, must be destroyed. For this purpose, Obama was put in the White House. And, as one looks around, there is ample evidence on every corner to prove that he has succeeded. Beyond his wildest dreams , probably. However, he cannot take credit solely by himself. The murder of America, as a source of good is shared by every dirty, sorry bastard that voted for him. Her blood is on all their hands. And, as the Apostle Paul wrote, As one sows, so shall he reap. The seeds of America’s destruction have been sown and soon they will be ready for reaping.


54 posted on 07/16/2015 5:20:38 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
if murder of an innocent baby is a 10, whatever you do with the body will at most qualify for a 2

Exactly. Where has their conscience been since the evil scotus legalized infanticide in 1973?

55 posted on 07/16/2015 5:21:03 AM PDT by LouAvul (Venal and evil people are destroying the world you live in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

If it isn’t happening already, it will soon; that is, having abortions for profit.

For if Planned Parenthood (PP) can sell the body parts, shouldn’t the formerly pregnant woman get a share of the profits? Wouldn’t it be even more profitable to hire a stable of women to repeatedly get pregnant to have profitable abortions?

To make even more money, PP could enlist women who have recessive genes, congenital diseases & abnormalities, & the like. Perhaps the women could be mated with men who share such physical characteristics to produce just the right organs for research. Naturally, the baby needs to be carried to near birth so that the organs will be fully developed.

I can just hear the doctor saying, “Mrs. Smith, if we birth this baby it will cost you plenty, but if we abort it you will go home with a nice profit. So which will it be?”

All this should be absurd, yet it isn’t. Evil grows if not checked.


56 posted on 07/16/2015 5:42:24 AM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade

As a man that helped PP financially and —legislatively—, he is an accomplice. An accomplice that many liberals on FR wanted to be president no matter what.

That those people want to excuse their actions over him doesn’t really matter. Their votes for him kept him in GOP politics influencing the GOP’s own support and legislation/funding.

And just as Mitt Romney was the founder of legal gay marriage in America, his company, Stericycle, was one of the original abortion for profit beneficiaries. And knowing that, and IGNORING IT, people DEMANDED his election.

So yea, Mitt is completely deserving for some blame to be laid on. As are his voters.


57 posted on 07/16/2015 8:21:53 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

58 posted on 07/16/2015 9:43:11 AM PDT by BigEdLB (They need to target the 'Ministry of Virtue' which has nothing to do with virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Can you explain any difference between Romney profiteering from broken baby bodies and Planned Parenthood doing the same?

Excellent question, the responses have been quite telling.

59 posted on 07/16/2015 10:02:47 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson