1. She ran a stop sign.
2. She changed lanes in front of a cop with no signal.
3. She was arrested for neither of these.
4. She was arrested and charged for assaulting a police officer.
Why is it that you can’t follow a simple sequence of events?
“You feel good about that traffic law? That a person can get arrested for not signaling a lane change?”
What does your above question even mean? It literally makes no sense at all.
Are you being purposefully ignorant?
What you don’t seem to get is that she was forcibly removed from the car because she gave her opinion to the cop that it was a BS stop..He did not like her attitude. That is the basis of her civil rights being violated. First Amendment .You could even say, because her rights were violated- that she had the right to fight back. Somehow, I think he was beating the c**p out of her. If you cannot see that, that this was police abuse, then I feel sorry for you and Mr Texas.
Wait and see, big lawsuit coming. I give this guy less than 6 months on the force.