The bias doesn’t have to be on the part of the newspaper... it can be on the part of the columnist. It happens every day in every newspaper in America.
There is plenty of circumstantial evidence for those who don’t mind opening their eyes to see it..... that obviously is not you.
Incidentally..... I am a St. Louis Cardinal fan. Somebody in the Cardinal front office hacked the Houston Astros. They haven’t gotten totally to the bottom of it yet, the investigation is continuing.
Regardless of who it was, or how pervasive or innocuous it was they will be penalized and they will deserve it.
Please note how I answered you without calling you a moron or referring to the “small recesses of your mind”.
Namecalling is the last refuge of a man with no confidence in his argument. You are no better than those on the left who do the same thing.
That's because there is none, and it's obviously not what you're interested in.
I held back on insults daring you to provide evidence, when you didn't (because you can't, because there is none) I did succumb to calling you what you appear to be. It had no bearing on the strength of my points, but it felt good saying the obvious.
Sorry about that, but that doesn't help your lack of argument, nor diminish my very important argument that there is no evidence. None. Quite the contrary, the evidence is hugely in his favor. But you're not interested in evidence.