Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/29/2015 3:35:14 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cotton1706

Actually, that’s the fair thing to do.


2 posted on 07/29/2015 3:42:00 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

I applaud this. Not because Lindsay Graham gets a break, but because I don’t want the media determining who we get to hear from.

I always felt that the top ten rule was arbitrary and that they should divide the group in half and have two separate debates. Though, I’d rather the debate participants for each of the two be random instead of based on polling, which has proven to be suspect in the last few election cycles.


3 posted on 07/29/2015 3:50:32 AM PDT by big'ol_freeper (Mi baol ach dom olcas mise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

It seems that the people they wanted in the debates to take down Trump weren’t going to make it, as no one from our side was interested in hearing their Establishment crap.

...so what the hell, change the rules at the last minute.

Still better than simply kicking Trump out, because they don’t like his ‘tone’, which I’m sure they also considered.


5 posted on 07/29/2015 3:54:24 AM PDT by BobL (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my 'profile' page))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

Bowing to pressure from the RNC.


6 posted on 07/29/2015 4:00:31 AM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Hillary - Ethically sleazy and politically stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

So what happened to the forum or do these guys now get to participate in both?


7 posted on 07/29/2015 4:06:37 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Sad fact, most people just want a candidate to tell them what they want to hear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

I doubt this will help Graham a great deal. It would be nice to see Fiorina edge up a bit.


8 posted on 07/29/2015 4:09:12 AM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

So a bunch of losers get to waste air time that would never win any way. Why didn’t they just get a job at CNN, MSNBC or FOX? Talk about worthless air time.


9 posted on 07/29/2015 4:16:48 AM PDT by lostboy61 (LH and Load and stand your ground!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

Why the defeatist message (so loser Lindsey, etc. can participate)?

Let the low polling candidates have a shot. If you are a conservative, you believe that competition breeds excellence.


10 posted on 07/29/2015 4:19:35 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Scott Walker - a more conservative governor than Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

Maybe they were afraid Jeb wouldn’t make the cut...(Minday’’s Special Report was a subtle infomercial!). Not going to watch if the losers are going to get the microphone...who cares what <1% ‘ers think? They might as well ask me to participate, I’d be more interesting than Lindsey.


11 posted on 07/29/2015 4:21:46 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag ( Anything FREELY-GIVEN by the government was TAKEN from someone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

It’s good that Lindsey will get into the debate to “set the record straight” and make the people of SC so proud of their selection. Who knows, people in other states may decide to duplicate the hapless Republican primary voters of SC.


13 posted on 07/29/2015 4:26:01 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706
So this tells me the RNC (Prebius) , Rove and Fox are working with Linda and Perry to smear Trump non stop.

I smell a set up here.

The Three Gope options Walker, Jebbie and Rubio don't want to get there Hands Dirty on national TV so let the third tier loser do the heavy lifting.

It will be ugly.
This is Walkers buddy RNC Prebius up to his dirty tricks again!

14 posted on 07/29/2015 4:29:46 AM PDT by ncalburt ( Amnesty-media out in full force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

Good. This should get Carly into the debate then. I don’t know a great deal about her positions, but every time I see her on the news she is taking Hillary to task and not putting up with BS gotcha games from the reporters.


15 posted on 07/29/2015 4:34:01 AM PDT by Reaper19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

I think the Top Ten in National Polls to participate in the prime time debate is ridiculous. The current polls, especially the National Polls are meaningless. A more practical approach would be to hold two back to back one hour or 90 minute debates with 8 candidates in each segment. The selection of which segment the 16 candidates would appear in would be based on a random draw. If anybody at Fox is viewing this, you might want to suggest this format.


18 posted on 07/29/2015 4:38:49 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy (frequently.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

Anything that would keep that sniveling faggot, Lindsay Graham, off the stage would be ok with me.


19 posted on 07/29/2015 4:39:10 AM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

There has to be a cut-off at some point. The top ten division makes sense to me. Even ten is barely workable.


20 posted on 07/29/2015 4:47:53 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

To cover all participants,

“raise your hand if ...”

“yes or no? ...”

==

Each one will be lucky to get a total of 3 minutes response time.

Barring an ‘I forgot the 3rd department I would eliminate’ moment, this debate will not result in much information for the viewers.


22 posted on 07/29/2015 4:56:14 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

Well, they exceeded the “gay” quota at least.


23 posted on 07/29/2015 5:02:21 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

I wonder how Fox will be fair (yeah...stupid question given the hosts). Will they give all candidates for both sessions the questions ahead of time? Or will they use the same questions to both sessions?

If they use different questions, they will be accused of being unfair. If they use the same questions they will be accused of being unfair, because the second session will have time to refine their answers.


26 posted on 07/29/2015 5:47:29 AM PDT by Bobby_Taxpayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

Fox News is opening its 5 p.m. debate to all the announced Republican candidates
who fail to make the cut for the Aug. 6 prime-time event,

***************

Don’t believe that Fox is opening the debate to the other 100 or
so GOP announced candidates...

Presidential Candidates:
http://www.fec.gov/press/resources/2016presidential_form2dt.shtml


27 posted on 07/29/2015 5:52:18 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

so ANYBODY who declares can join in?

ANYBODY?

howard stern?


28 posted on 07/29/2015 8:48:27 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson