Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t believe this was meant for just Church leaders, but lets say you are right, then answer me this; Why would you want a man that is not qualified to hold the position of Deacon (I didn’t say holds, but is qualified to hold) in his Church to sit in the Oval Office?


20 posted on 07/29/2015 7:31:24 AM PDT by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Kartographer

RE: Why would you want a man that is not qualified to hold the position of Deacon (I didn’t say holds, but is qualified to hold) in his Church to sit in the Oval Office?

Ideally, we want a man who is CONSISTENT in all ways, private and public. THAT should be our ideal.

Unfortunately, we are often not given such choices.

Therefore, we have to choose the less perfect person as long as his policies are right for the country.

King David would not have even made Deacon in a church with his dysfunctional family, but I sure has heck would not want anybody else to be King of Israel then.


22 posted on 07/29/2015 7:37:41 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer

ROFLOL.

So I have to vote for a Serbian Orthodox candidate who goes to confession weekly and has a degree in theology . . . who also believes in limited government. That limits my choices.

Or does it only count if they are qualified to be a deacon in YOUR church?


23 posted on 07/29/2015 7:43:03 AM PDT by cizinec (Liberty is the only political "party" that deserves our loyalty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson