Catholic ping!
The left will willingly distort the truth to please militant fangtooth feminazis.
The fee schedule purports to estimate the reimbursable cost allocable to retrieving a particular body part, organ or tissue. If the laws against trafficking were being observed, the fees for providing the fetal parts ordered should essentially correspond to the wholesaler?s costs of $6,700 computed above.
According to logs detailing tissue shipments, 155 specimens were shipped in a representative month. These specimens included:
<><> 47 livers,
<><> 11 liver fragments,
<><>7 brains,
<><>21 eyes,
<><> 8 thymuses,
<><> 23 legs,
<><> 14 pancreases,
<><> 14 lungs,
<><> 6 arms,
<><> 1 kidney/adrenal gland, and,
<><> 3 intact specimens for purposes of securing the blood.
When priced out according to the “Fee for Service Schedule,” the shipment of parts for the month generated gross revenues of between $18,700 and $24,700, depending upon whether the parts were shipped fresh or frozen.
Some sample prices for individual body parts from the above-referenced schedule are as follows:
<><> liver $150,
<><> pancreas $100,
<>><>thymus $100,
<><> kidney $125,
<><> lungs and heart block $150,
<><> brain $999,
<><> spinal cord $325,
<><> bone morrow $350,
<><> eyes $75,
<><> gonads $550,
<><> intact cadaver $400,
<><> intact trunk with/without limbs $500,
<><> limbs (at least 2) $150.
(hat tip to FReeper MMICHAELS for doing the research on this.)
By that reasoning government should resume execution of criminals by burning at the stake in the cause of finding treatments for sunburns.
If fetal tissue can help others, what about the BABY from whom it was taken? To accept that the ‘baby parts’ are nothing but a ‘clump of tissue’, you have to admit that you don’t care about the murder of a human being. Libs use the manipulation of words (and even the redefining of words) to confuse the masses. And they have had control of our Education system for so long that our country has certainly been dumbed-down enough for the ‘masses’ to accept the twisted ‘logic’ of the Lib manipulation.
So where’s Pope Francis on this? He had an opinion on climate change, shouldn’t he have an opinion on something which his own church is at the forefront of opposing?
Thank you for this post and for showing me what seems to be a Catholic Conservative website. I have bookmarked it to have a more in-debt look later. I haven’t found many.
Pay no attention to the butcher behind the bloody curtain.
Has anyone at the New York Times ever donated a kidney for the benefit of mankind, or even donated blood at the Red Cross?
If science can benefit from research on baby body parts, think how much more it could benefit if adults were encouraged to donate their healthy organs after death. No organization could be more influential in promoting such organ donation than the New York Times, yet it has never taken up this issue.
Yet all of a sudden today the Old Gray Lady is beside herself with enthusiasm about the humanitarian benefits of harvesting organs from aborted fetuses for money by Planned Parenthood, whose hundreds of clinics throughout the country have basically become butcher shops.
What’s next? If baby livers turn out to taste better than calves livers, would anyone be surprised if Planned Parenthood started selling them to restaurants?
