Posted on 08/01/2015 8:22:11 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[FULL TITLE] Now it Makes Sense… San Francisco Judge Trying to Block Planned Parenthood Videos Raised Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars for Barack Obama
Federal Judge William H. Orrick’s attempt to silence journalists at Center for Medical Progress should send chills down the spine of every single American. Because if successful, it will establish that radical leftist judges can shut down any journalist or media outlet who exposes the evil agenda shared by the Obama Administration.
And Orrick is, without question, a radical federal judge serving as a gate keeper for Obama’s agenda. Orrick was appointed by Obama and was a major bundler for Obama’s campaign.
Orrick was nominated to his position by hardline abortion supporter President Barack Obama. He was also a major donor to and bundler for President Obama’s presidential campaign. He raised at least $200,000 for Obama and donated $30,800 to committees supporting him, according to Public Citizen.
And now it makes sense why the National Abortion Federation was able to magically obtain a restraining order on the release of more videos in just a matter of hours. Orrick is a radical who almost immediately knocked down the 1st Amendment, ordering that journalists are not free to report on what Planned Parenthood is doing in terms of harvesting babies and their organs during abortion.
Here is Orrick’s restraining order, issued just hours after the NAF filed in San Francisco.
YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on Monday, August 3, 2015 at 4:00 p.m., before the Honorable William H. Orrick, at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102, Courtroom 2, why you, your officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and any other persons who are in active concert or participation with you, should not be enjoined and restrained from engaging in, committing, or performing, directly and indirectly, any and all of the following acts:
(1) publishing or otherwise disclosing to any third party any video, audio, photographic, or other recordings taken, or any confidential information learned, at any NAF annual meetings;
(2) publishing or otherwise disclosing to any third party the dates or locations of any future NAF meetings;
(3) publishing or otherwise disclosing to any third party the names or addresses of any NAF members learned at any NAF annual meetings; and
(4) attempting to gain access to any future NAF meetings.Pending hearing on the above Order to Show Cause you, your officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and any other persons who are in active concert or participation with you ARE HEREBY RESTRAINED AND ENJOINED from:
(1) publishing or otherwise disclosing to any third party any video, audio, photographic, or other recordings taken, or any confidential information learned, at any NAF annual meetings;
(2) publishing or otherwise disclosing to any third party the dates or locations of any future NAF meetings; and
(3) publishing or otherwise disclosing to any third party the names or addresses of any NAF members learned at any NAF annual meetings.
Freedom of speech alive and well in America? Yeah, no. Not if Obama’s judges have any say in the matter. And as we see here, they most certainly do.
No conflict of interest at all here. None whatsoever.
With his obvious po.itical activism why is he a federal judge? Doesn’t the Hatch Act apply?
Regardless, the video-makers should tell the judge to piss off and release the video.
It's time for some civil disobedience.
"Mr. Goebbels prefers that you not release the videotapes of the gas chambers. Thank you."
.
It’s called speaking truth to power yer honor.
.
politicians on the bench, don’t expect justice
I understand why blacks support a baby killing evil bastard like Obama and all the evil bastard democrats but I can’t say why I understand it. That would be considered racist.
And as for impeaching this obviously corrupt, traitorous judge, the GOP-controlled Congress will do................................................. nothing.
This is state sponsored mass murder with state sponsored suppression of opposition to it.
Isn’t it against the law to harvest tissue from aborted fetuses? Aren’t there huge profits being made? Where is the IRS investigation?
“It’s time for some civil disobedience.”
It definitely is. I’m trying figure out what that looks like on a local level.
55 MILLION abortions have happened since 1973.
It makes me physically ill almost to even type that number.
Prior Restraint
In First Amendment law, a prior restraint is government action that prohibits speech or other expression before it can take place. There are two common forms of prior restraints. The first is a statute or regulation that requires a speaker to acquire a permit or license before speaking, and the second is a judicial injunction that prohibits certain speech. Both types of prior restraint are strongly disfavored, and, with some exceptions, generally unconstitutional.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/prior_restraint
There is no difference between this and what the Nazis were doing.
I’m a reading a book about Bonhoffer.
Many parallels between pre war Germany and today in our nation in how Christianity was comprised. In my opinion.
You hit that nail on the head.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.