Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2013/02/17/why-is-harry-reid-always-voting-against-his-own-plans/

“... somebody on the winning side of the cloture vote — in this case, the side voting against cloture — has to file a “motion to reconsider” if the matter is to be taken up again... any supporter of the bill or nomination in question could do the same, but traditionally it’s been the majority leader.”

That’s why! The cloture motion can be reconsidered ad infinitum but it can only be brought up by a ‘winner’ of the cloture vote.


94 posted on 08/03/2015 4:09:15 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith
-- That's why! The cloture motion can be reconsidered ad infinitum but it can only be brought up by a `winner' of the cloture vote. --

I agree wuth that, just saying that a failed cloture motion doesn't preclude filing a second, third, fourth, fifth, ad infinitum cloture votes on the same subject. Multiple cloture motions is (or at least used to be) the common method of having "the same" (cloture) vote multiple times.

104 posted on 08/03/2015 4:21:36 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson