Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
If you are a stockholder, yes. People who home-school their kids are still required to pay that portion of their property taxes that go to fund schools.

B I N G O
7 posted on 08/04/2015 1:27:29 PM PDT by BigEdLB (They need to target the 'Ministry of Virtue' which has nothing to do with virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: BigEdLB; humblegunner; beelzepug

I think there’s a crucial difference between these two concepts.

The children of taxpayers are qualified to attend these schools and have access to their athletic programs. If they wish to opt in, they should be able to, participating in the school education process or not.

The owners of stock are never qualified to get top executive salaries or benefits. I don’t believe there is any supporting reason for them to be able to opt in.

We’re talking two different types of situations here. I don’t see a way to compare them favorably.

I think it was a fun suggestion, but I don’t see more than that in it.


13 posted on 08/04/2015 1:40:55 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Moving day: June 16th, 2015. LEFT >>>HOPE and CHANGE>>> RIGHT / [DOPE and STRANGE stay home].)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson