Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Buttons12

Doesn’t this violate both judicial and government standards for records retention?


2 posted on 08/07/2015 7:08:56 PM PDT by BlueNgold (May I suggest a very nice 1788 Article V with your supper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BlueNgold

The State Department itself has not been forthcoming with Judge Sullivan, with Congress, or with anyone else.

It allowed Mrs. Clinton to use an off-the-grid system for her entire tenure in the Department, and it kept that startling fact a secret as long as possible.

It is simply shocking that the State Department did not immediately inform Congress, the Court, and Judicial Watch that Mrs. Clinton operated solely on a private email server and that the State Department did not have her records. It took months even to discover those crucial facts.


17 posted on 08/07/2015 7:25:28 PM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BlueNgold

Yes. And yes.


25 posted on 08/07/2015 7:30:39 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BlueNgold
Doesn’t this violate both judicial and government standards for records retention?

In my humble and purely amateur opinion, it doesn't matter because we are no longer a nation of laws, never mind "standards." We are ruled by men; politicians, bureaucrats, judges, inspectors, etc.

Whatever a judge decides, goes.

33 posted on 08/07/2015 7:39:33 PM PDT by Buttons12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BlueNgold

Yes, go to jail, go directly to jail...
prosecute her lawyers too.


71 posted on 08/08/2015 3:26:47 AM PDT by CPT Clay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BlueNgold
Doesn’t this violate both judicial and government standards for records retention?

Only if you are a Republican.

83 posted on 08/08/2015 6:38:19 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BlueNgold
Doesn’t this violate both judicial and government standards for records retention?

RAT Response - "SO WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT? OUR PARTY CONTROLS THE AG AND DOJ!"
88 posted on 08/08/2015 7:59:48 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BlueNgold
Doesn’t this violate both judicial and government standards for records retention?

Are you assuming they care?

90 posted on 08/08/2015 9:06:42 AM PDT by wastedyears (Iron Maiden - The Book of Souls, out Sept 4th, 2015)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BlueNgold

Do they mention her BO, halitosis, and bitchy temperament?


97 posted on 08/08/2015 4:20:40 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BlueNgold

Probably. But nobody cares. Especially the judiciary court system of the USA or even the RINOcrats of the puke party winnies.


109 posted on 08/09/2015 6:27:48 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (It is about THE CROSS. It has always been and always will be about the CROSS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson