Posted on 08/14/2015 4:17:01 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Calling Saddam's ouster a "pretty good deal" and name-checking Paul Wolfowitz, Jeb keeps rivals' hope alive.
Im running out of ways to describe the awfulness of Jeb Bushs presidential campaign. If or when he fails, his jocular Thursday comment about the Iraq war Taking down Saddam Hussein turned out to be a pretty good deal will be in every highlight reel.
Not only is Jeb! now fully embracing his brothers disastrous, bloody war of choice. Hes talking about it in a glib salesman way, reminding us that the war was in fact a pretty good deal for his cronies: for Halliburton spinoff KBR, the entire defense industry, and a metastasizing web of private security contractors including disgraced giant Blackwater. The families of the dead and wounded in Iraq might disagree.
Things got worse in his speech Friday, where he volunteered that Paul Wolfowitz is giving some advice. Wolfowitz, the scowling face of the smug neocons.
Ive asked this before: Does Bush even want to win?
Donald Trump claimed Bush had his 47 percent moment the comment that doomed Mitt Romney when he suggested were spending too much on womens health. But his dumb remark about toppling Saddam being a pretty good deal could rival that. Then again, there are so many contenders for the inconvenient, inadvertent truth-telling moment that could doom Bush: suggesting underpaid American workers need to work more hours; that the federal government shouldnt be doing this when asked about the minimum wage; arguing that we should be phasing out Medicare.
Of course he walked all of those remarks back. Lets see if he tries to do the same with this one.
All of these campaign flubs are occurring against the backdrop of the strangest presidential primary of our lifetimes, in which Donald Trump has taken the lead nationally, as well as in Iowa and New Hampshire, with 16 lackluster rivals trying to catch up. For a while Bush strategists were pretending the Trump candidacy benefited Bush, by depriving his rivals of the attention they need to gain traction, and predicting Bush would consolidate support as some of the bloated GOP field dropped out. I used to think that myself, to be honest. But now Im not so sure.
Whose support does Jeb! think he will consolidate as the campaign goes on? Which of the non-Trump candidates is likely to throw him support? Sen. Ted Cruz and Ben Carson are surging after last weeks debate, and neither mans supporters seem a likely match for Bush. Cruz is second so far in fundraising, so he isnt going anywhere, and if Carson stumbles, his voters wont flock to Bush. Among the current bottom-tier candidates, who might be expected to leave the race early Governors Rick Perry and Bobby Jindal, plus Mike Huckabee and Rick Santorum all are to Bushs right and seem unlikely to throw him their support (which is a collective 9.5 percent right now, anyway). Sen. Rand Paul is flailing: hes averaging 4.5 percent in national polls and has fallen from third to ninth place in Iowa (once a stronghold, thanks to his dad) and from third to sixth in New Hampshire. But his supporters arent a natural for Bush, either.
Of the candidates who are closer to the Bush wing of the party Senators Marco Rubio and Lindsey Graham, Governors John Kasich, Chris Christie and Scott Walker, former Gov. George Pataki and perhaps Carly Fiorina only Pataki, Christie and Graham seem like contenders who arent contending, and probably wont. But by definition, that means none of them has much support he can turn over to Bush if he leaves the race, since theyre each polling between 0 and 3.8 percent.
For now, Fiorina and Kasich are rising, so theyre not going anywhere soon. Walker is sinking, but I have a hard time thinking that the ambitious Wisconsin governor and his moneyed backers will pull the plug quickly (although if Walker loses his neighboring state of Iowa, where hes now dropped from a persistent 1st place to 3rd, the humiliation might drive him back to Madison). Rubio shares a natural constituency with Bush, and you can imagine a scenario in which he could be persuaded by mutual friends to step aside. But with Bush so weak, and with a decent war chest, he might think it should be Jeb who steps aside. And he might find others in the GOP establishment who agree.
Even if Trump fades, who fattens up on his voters? Its probably not Bush. Trump fading or even dropping out would certainly shake up the race, and its certainly possible, if not likely, that will happen. Trump skeptics comfort themselves by saying his frontrunner status reflects his celebrity as well as the crowded field and that the 20-25 percent support hes getting in polls isnt a commanding lead anyway.
But thats where Mitt Romney rode out much of the 2012 campaign: from June 2011 to February 2012, according to Real Clear Politics, Romney hovered between 20 and 28 percent in the polls. For most of that time he was ahead of the pack, though he did surrender the polling lead to Newt Gingrich, Herman Cain and Rick Santorum, briefly. He only began to break away once hed won some early primaries, and some rivals dropped out.
Romney benefited from candidates to his right splitting the Tea Party vote, while he chased out moderates like Jon Huntsman and Tim Pawlenty early. Conceivably Bush could benefit from the same split on the right, especially if Trump stumbles. But Bush was supposed to chase away a lot of his rivals with his presumed electability and large war chest. With every gaffe and stumble, the myth of his electability dissipates. Hes still got that war chest, though, so we cant count him out.
In this case I pray she’s right.
We just may have found a male dumber than a Kardashian.
2016!!
I read a book about Jeb! and one of his favorite saying is:
“There is no tooth fairy and there are no heroes.”
Very cynical guy, although you’d have to be after growing up in that family.
One wonders if there is a context here. Or is it just a generic downer.
Hey he is still Charles Krauthammer Pick in Fox’s casino
Does Bush even want to win?
NO...never wanted to run in the first place.
Back when Hillary was a lock for the D nomination, I felt Bush was a sure winner for the R, based on crossover voting in the primaries (elect the most beatable R candidate).
Now I’m not nearly as sure. It looks like the Dems may have to vote for Dems.
Krauthammer is on board The Cheap Labor Express.
Rubio was his top pick tonight, also a cheap labor importer.
I disagree with many of Joan’s conclusions, but she has written a rather good and useful piece. It’s like introducing all the players on the baseball team, and comparing their stats. Wondering who will be the MVP?
Whenever I hear Jeb Bush speak, I get the same sensation I had the night I walked barefoot through my living room and stepped right into some dog vomit that squished between my toes.
Some folks seem to miss the immense magnitude of Conservative revulsion to Jeb. It has mostly to do with amnesty for illegal aliens. This is the benchmark, the absolute center of our dauntless and indefatigable opposition to Jeb. (Call amnesty "pathway", call it "dreamer"... it's all amnesty for illegal aliens, and everyone knows it.)
Jebs also chooses to insult us with speeches (at least in part) in spanish. Voters must be citizens, and that's a good thing, n'est ce pas?
And then, there's common core. Need we say more?
Jeb, we see right through ya.
Auf Wiedersehen.
.
How could any sane person believe anyone named “Bush” is electable? They really don’t get it how much they are disliked, do they?
I love Mark Steyn’s nickname for Bush: Jeb the Unready.
He should have listened to his mother.
Salon is a French word that means a room used for entertaining. Salons were where people had philosophical and political discussions in France during the 17th-19th Centuries.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.