And what data company doesn’t back-up and back-up again and do a back-up. I say BS. If what they say is true, who would want to use them for there server services?
If it’s just a co-located server, the hosting company would have no responsibility or access to do backups, they’re just there to provide network connectivity, UPS, physical security, and to swap failed RAID drives or do other hardware maintenance as requested by the client.
The real question here is that if the drives were blank, what exactly was being hosted there? There’s no reason to co-locate a server with blank drives, it wouldn’t do anything.
Silence is it's own reward.
Criminals and politicians?
By saying this....they’ve ended any future big-time contracts. My guess is that it’ll fold in a matter of weeks and be bought by someone for fifty-percent of the value, then renamed.