Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress can end birthright citizenship simply by passing a law
American Thinker ^ | Aug 19, 2015 | Newsmachete

Posted on 08/19/2015 5:37:41 PM PDT by EXCH54FE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: WhiskeyX
are obligated to maintain a temporary allegiance to the United States and its laws.

Citizens are not required to bare allegiance or there wouldn't be any democrats.

I guess you didn't notice that Obama changed the oath the other day so that Muslims are not required to swear allegiance to the Constitution.

61 posted on 08/20/2015 12:12:10 PM PDT by itsahoot (55 years a republican-Now Independent. Will write in Sarah Palin, no matter who runs. RIH-GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

Makes sense, the only problem is we don’t have GOP majority in both sides of Congress willing to do ANYTHING even approaching conservative norms. All the GOP pols do is go along to get along, then when election time comes they promise this time they will really really act like a Republican, they get re-elected and then do nothing again.

Any wonder why Trump is popular? It shouldn’t be.


62 posted on 08/20/2015 12:12:46 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster
I doubt anything will change but the next obvious question is how retroactive can this go?

It can go wherever they want it to go and no farther since we are governed by our betters.

63 posted on 08/20/2015 12:15:29 PM PDT by itsahoot (55 years a republican-Now Independent. Will write in Sarah Palin, no matter who runs. RIH-GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

“According to the author even foreign citizens here legally are not subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. so their children can’t be citizens. His words and not mine.”

Rights, Privileges, and Duties of Aliens

Legal immigrants enjoy the opportunity to reside within the United States without having obtained U.S. citizenship. While they have no legal or constitutional rights to remain within the country, they may stay provided that the government renews their visas at the expiration of the previous visa. In return for the U.S. granting temporary residence, these aliens owe “temporary allegiance” to the United States. Temporary allegiance involves obeying all U.S. laws while within the U.S., implied consent to U.S. court jurisdiction for alleged violation of tort and commercial laws, and submission to the court system’s power of subpoena.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/alien

[In other words, aliens are subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. laws and courts; and your author is spouting utter nonsense.]


64 posted on 08/20/2015 6:19:35 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX
...implied consent to U.S. court jurisdiction for alleged violation of tort and commercial laws, and submission to the court system’s power of subpoena

Can they refuse to consent to U.S. court jurisdiction?

65 posted on 08/20/2015 6:23:21 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Plummz

Naturalized, however, is not the same as natural born.


66 posted on 08/20/2015 6:27:08 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

“Can they refuse to consent to U.S. court jurisdiction?”

Generally speaking I doubt it with respect to domestic controversies and criminal law, but I suspect there may be some special exceptions in certain areas of civil law, maritime law, and martial law in which the Law of Nations or the Laws of War would involve international issues.


67 posted on 08/20/2015 6:43:27 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Yup.


68 posted on 08/20/2015 7:34:55 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
You know, I saw the dates for Jindal's naturalization earlier today but I didn't save the link. IIRC it was something like his father naturalized in 1976 and his mother in 1982. Why they didn't naturalize at the same time, I don't know.

Also, it turns out they didn't come over on a student visa for his mother. His father, an engineer, got a skilled-worker visa under the 1965 immigration law.

69 posted on 08/20/2015 7:40:20 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson