Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg

“On the other hand she was elected to carry out the duties of the county clerk, one of which is to issue marriage licenses”

Yes, but the “marriage licenses” she has the official duty to issue are Kentucky marriage licenses, NOT Federal marriage licenses, and Kentucky marriage licenses do not apply to — and, therefore, it is ludicrous to issue them to — same-sex couples.

By proxy (SCOTUS) FedGov has it’s position on the subject; Kentucky remains unmoved.

I’ve got a bad feeling this thing’s going to be hammer-and-tongs down to the last man standing.


230 posted on 09/02/2015 12:53:35 AM PDT by HKMk23 (You ask how to fight an idea? Well, I'll tell you how: with another idea!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: HKMk23
Yes, but the “marriage licenses” she has the official duty to issue are Kentucky marriage licenses, NOT Federal marriage licenses, and Kentucky marriage licenses do not apply to — and, therefore, it is ludicrous to issue them to — same-sex couples.

That's why I think the most effective approach here would be for states to get out of the business of issuing marriage licenses entirely.

Who the hell is anyone in a state government to insist on "licensing" a marriage, in the first place?

234 posted on 09/02/2015 4:18:29 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson