Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge orders Rowan clerk to appear in court Thursday after she again denies marriage licenses
Kentucky.com ^ | 1 Sep 15 | John Cheves

Posted on 09/01/2015 4:25:48 PM PDT by SkyPilot

A federal judge has ordered Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis and her deputies to appear in his courtroom Thursday and explain why Davis should not be held in contempt of court for refusing to issue marriage licenses.

Shortly after opening her doors Tuesday, Davis told two same-sex couples who asked for marriage licenses that she would not issue them, despite a federal court injunction ordering her to do so. In a brief but tense encounter between Davis and a couple dozen marriage-equality demonstrators who crowded into her office, the clerk repeatedly refused to comply with the court order.

"Under whose authority are you not issuing marriage licenses?" someone in the crowd asked Davis.

"Under God's authority," she responded.

"I'm willing to face my consequences and you all will face your consequences when it comes time for judgment," she said. "Plain and simple."

(Excerpt) Read more at kentucky.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: christian; gaykkk; homosexual; homosexualagenda; kimdavis; libertarians; medicalmarijuana; persecution; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
"Under God's authority," she responded.

"I'm willing to face my consequences and you all will face your consequences when it comes time for judgment," she said. "Plain and simple."

Please pray for Kim Davis.

1 posted on 09/01/2015 4:25:48 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

We need prisoners of conscience.


2 posted on 09/01/2015 4:27:36 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (RINOs EARNED TRUMP! I prefer Cruz, but someone has to kick their A$$!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

I would also challenge them to point to a law that was debated and passed.
Judges hold no legislative power..


3 posted on 09/01/2015 4:27:42 PM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

I’m from PA and remember when Kane, our (currently embattled) AG refused to defend the Pennsylvania “definition of marriage” act in court due to her personal beliefs. I guess that’s OK for this bunch of hypocrites.


4 posted on 09/01/2015 4:28:49 PM PDT by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

She should send the local Sheriff to tell the Feds to take a hike. Roberts should be the hike leader.


5 posted on 09/01/2015 4:29:14 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Kudos to her for taking a stand at great risk personally and professionally. Some things are worth fighting for, even if it is a losing battle. God bless her.


6 posted on 09/01/2015 4:30:03 PM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

It is well within the Governor Beshear’s power to have both prevented this conflict to begin with, and now to end this conflict without causing anyone to violate their beliefs. He chooses not to do so - does he like the turmoil?


7 posted on 09/01/2015 4:31:48 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

These federal black robed tyrants see themselves as gods. I see them as contemptible excuses for decent human beings.


8 posted on 09/01/2015 4:32:18 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
Some things are worth fighting for, even if it is a losing battle. God bless her.

Those who suffer persecution for God are rewarded by Christ, in this life or the next.

9 posted on 09/01/2015 4:32:27 PM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

A federal judge also has no jurisdiction to be issuing an order to a state official to carry out a state function. They are in the wrong venue...but apparently this judge is clueless on this issue.


10 posted on 09/01/2015 4:33:29 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

God be with this courageous woman. She needs our prayers.


11 posted on 09/01/2015 4:35:01 PM PDT by teletech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

The public needs to back this woman with and over 100,000 strong protest.

This stuff has got to stop, and this is one line too far IMO.


12 posted on 09/01/2015 4:35:53 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
marriage-equality demonstrators

Perverts

13 posted on 09/01/2015 4:36:31 PM PDT by TYVets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

I don’t know how she gets out of the trap of the existing legal system. If she shows up, the judge may have her taken into custody and imprisoned. If she doesn’t appear, the judge will issue an order for her arrest. Unless the local authorities are willing to defy and confront the court with whatever is necessary, she will likely become a prisoner of conscience.


14 posted on 09/01/2015 4:37:00 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
"Under whose authority are you not issuing marriage licenses?" someone in the crowd asked Davis.

"Under God's authority," she responded.

Jesus said to them, “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.”

She understands scripture - our loyalty and obedience are among the many things that are God's.

15 posted on 09/01/2015 4:40:32 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Notice how the homosexual lawyers are adamant that she should have increasing fines until she is crushed, *not* jail time.

If she gets jail time, in a manner of speaking, she wins.


16 posted on 09/01/2015 4:41:13 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

This is clearly a matter of conscience.

She was able to do her job, which she was elected to, before the Supreme Court ruling was made.

Why should a Supreme Court ruling now force her from her elected position if it conflicts with her religious views?

And where is the law that codifies the Supreme Court decision? If Supreme Court judges now make law, then why do we need Congress. The Supremes can decide everything.

If Ms. Davis was wearing a burkha, we would not even be having this conversation.


17 posted on 09/01/2015 4:45:53 PM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Bunning, David L.
Born 1966 in Ft. Thomas, KY

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky
Nominated by George W. Bush on September 4, 2001, to a seat vacated by William O. Bertelsman. Confirmed by the Senate on February 14, 2002, and received commission on February 19, 2002.

Education:
University of Kentucky, B.A., 1988
University of Kentucky College of Law, J.D., 1991

Professional Career:
Law clerk, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Kentucky, 1991
Assistant U.S. attorney, Eastern District of Kentucky, 1991-2002


18 posted on 09/01/2015 4:46:58 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

it will be interesting how the judge reacts to being told no.

He may behave well and listen to her argument or puff-up his feathers and behave badly, how dare a citizen question a judge!

I suspect the later.


19 posted on 09/01/2015 4:48:43 PM PDT by Rumplemeyer (The GOP should stand its ground - and fix Bayonets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rumplemeyer

She should just politely decline to appear. She’s broken no law.


20 posted on 09/01/2015 4:52:17 PM PDT by RightFighter (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson