RE: The rule of natural law. Not the rule of pervert law, no matter how many people say otherwise.
_______________________________________
Yes, Natural Law. But even Kentucky Law prohibits same-sex marriage.
SOURCE:
http://usmarriagelaws.com/search/united_states/kentucky/index.shtml
KENTUCKY MARRIAGE LAW
EXCERPT:
Prohibited and Restricted Marriages:
* Marriages between persons who are nearer of kin to each other by blood, than second cousins.
* Marriages between first cousins.
* Marriages with a person mentally incompetent.
* Marriages where there is a husband or wife living, from whom the person marrying has not been divorced.
* Marriages not solemnized or contracted in the presence of an authorized person or society.
* Same sex marriages.
* Common law marriages.
* Proxy marriages.
So, Kim Davis is UPHOLDING Kentucky Law.
The wonder is not that she is doing so, it's that everyone else isn't.
I remember decades ago, we used to debate how the Germans could have let the Nazis do the things they did.
This is how.
If they allowed her to issue ‘gay marriage’ licenses without her signature like she wishes, would she then be breaking the law?
Freegards
This has been my position the whole time. She is bound to uphold the laws of the State of Kentucky. The only laws in existence that allow her to issue marriage licenses to ANYBODY, are the Kentucky Statutes. Since they specifically prohibit issuing licenses to same sex couples, she did the only reasonable and legal thing possible, which was to deny licenses to everyone.
Until and unless the Kentucky Legislature passes and the Governor signs, some new laws regarding marriage, there is no legal way to get married in Kentucky, and possibly many other states.