SEXBOTS: WHY WOMEN SHOULD PANIC

Breitbart ^ | September 16, 2015 | Milo Yiannopoulus

[ladyjane]

But are you ready to take care of her should she get sick?

[Bigg Red]

Touche!

[Utilizer]

That comes with the territory. It’s even in the vows, if I recall them correctly. Cherish and nurture, and of course support her should the need arise. I have always done so for Family in the past, and when married she would be part of us and therefore automatically cared for.

[rawcatslyentist]

I thought they claim that they were “born that way”.

They claim a lot of things, but if they have no control over their choice in sex, why don't more of them die from sex with a light socket?

What? You've never heard of them dying from having sex with a light socket?

Must be a choice then.

[Utilizer]

For better, for worse,
for richer, for poorer,
in sickness and in health,
until death do us part.

Thus do we pledge our lives to each other.

[PapaBear3625]

Watch as the husband barely keeps himself from busting out laughing as he leaps to his feet and is running for the door. Watch as h e sits in his Ford F-150 bouncing around In the cab as the music is blaring “American Woman” for the ‘5’th time this week’ How soon before these robots are available? (J/K)

I'm thinking that, as an intermediate stage before we get full "AI" sexbots, we might get "avatar" sexbots.

There's a porn sub-industry where you can video-conference with a woman, who performs for you. I can see a market where women with nice voices (who do not necessarily need to be attractive in real life) could act as controllers for sexbots for a fee. (Of course, suitable controls would need to be in place for the sexbot so the remote controller couldn't remotely harm/rob you)

[SunkenCiv]

Excellent!