Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton: Come Clean or Get Out
www.nationaljournal.com ^ | Wednesday, September 23, 2015 | Ron Fournier

Posted on 09/23/2015 10:10:55 AM PDT by Red Badger

If the Demo­crat­ic Party cares to sal­vage a sliv­er of mor­al au­thor­ity, its lead­ers and early state voters need to send Hil­lary Rod­ham Clin­ton an ur­gent mes­sage: Come clean or get out. Stop ly­ing and de­flect­ing about how and why you stashed State De­part­ment email on a secret serv­er—or stop run­ning.

Tell her: We can’t have an­oth­er day like this:

Story 1: The State De­part­ment con­firmed that Clin­ton turned over her email only after Con­gress dis­covered that she had ex­clus­ively used a private email sys­tem. Ac­cord­ing to The Wash­ing­ton Post, the de­part­ment first con­tac­ted her in the sum­mer of 2014, at least three months be­fore the agency asked Clin­ton and three of her pre­de­cessors to provide their emails.

The story un­der­cuts Clin­ton’s claim that her de­cision to turn over self-se­lec­ted email was a re­sponse to a routine-sound­ing re­cords re­quest. She hasn’t been telling the truth.

Story 2: A fed­er­al court has helped un­cov­er more emails re­lated to the Benghazi raid that were with­held from con­gres­sion­al in­vest­ig­at­ors. Clin­ton has in­sisted she turned over all her work-re­lated email and com­plied with con­gres­sion­al sub­poen­as.

Again, she hasn’t been telling the truth.

Story 3: The FBI has re­covered per­son­al and work-re­lated e-mails from her private serv­er, rais­ing the pos­sib­il­ity that the de­leted in­form­a­tion be­comes pub­lic. “The FBI is in­vest­ig­at­ing how and why clas­si­fied in­form­a­tion ended up on Clin­ton’s serv­er,” Bloomberg re­por­ted.

While the Demo­crat­ic front-run­ner still in­sists there was no clas­si­fied in­form­a­tion on the un­se­cured serv­er, the FBI has moved bey­ond wheth­er U.S. secrets were in­volved to how and why. In the lan­guage of law en­force­ment, the FBI is in­vest­ig­at­ing her motive.

On Sunday, Clin­ton told Face the Na­tion host John Dick­er­son: “What I did was al­lowed. It was fully above board,” and “I tried to be fully trans­par­ent.” Both claims are ob­ject­ively and in­dis­put­ably false.

From the mo­ment this story broke in March, seni­or Demo­crats told me they were wor­ried about where the ques­tions would lead. Sev­er­al said they feared what the emails might show about the in­ter­sec­tion of Clin­ton’s work at the State De­part­ment and the fam­ily’s private found­a­tion. One Clin­ton loy­al­ist, a cred­ible source who I’ve known for years, told me, “The emails are a re­lated but sec­ond­ary scan­dal. Fol­low the found­a­tion money.”

That is still spec­u­la­tion. But months of dis­hon­esty and de­cep­tion took their toll: A ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans don’t trust her, and the Demo­crat­ic nom­in­a­tion fight has shif­ted from a coron­a­tion to a com­pet­i­tion. A poll re­leased today by Bloomberg shows Clin­ton barely lead­ing so­cial­ist Bernie Sanders and Vice Pres­id­ent Joe Biden, who’s not even in the race.

For Demo­crats, this is an op­por­tun­ity wasted. A crowded GOP field has been taken host­age by a celebrity bil­lion­aire with a his­tory of bank­ruptcies, sex­ist be­ha­vi­or, and ra­cially of­fens­ive state­ments. Lack­ing a firm grip on policy or the truth, Don­ald Trump is the GOP front-run­ner. His closest com­pet­i­tion, Dr. Ben Car­son, said Sunday he didn’t think a Muslim should be pres­id­ent, and his ef­forts to clean up the con­tro­versy have been as ham-handed as they are dis­hon­est.

Which brings me back to Clin­ton. Loy­al­ists ar­gue that her policy agenda speaks to Amer­ica’s new demo­graphy and ad­dresses 21st-cen­tury chal­lenges. Even if they’re right, the Clin­ton team has un­der­es­tim­ated the value that voters place on a can­did­ate’s char­ac­ter. One top Clin­ton ad­viser told me in the spring, “Trust doesn’t mat­ter.”

Oft-burned Amer­ic­ans un­der­stand that a policy agenda is a col­lec­tion of prom­ises. If they can’t count on Clin­ton to be hon­est, they can’t count on her to keep her word about in­come in­equal­ity, jobs, health care, and the en­vir­on­ment.

She an­nounced a plan Tues­day to re­duce pre­scrip­tion-drug costs, prom­ising to cap monthly out-of-pock­et ex­penses at $250 without curb­ing profits that fund re­search in­to life-sav­ing drugs. Can you be­lieve her?

Over­shad­ow­ing that news was her long-awaited de­cision on the Key­stone pipeline: Clin­ton now op­poses a pro­ject she was once in­clined to sup­port at the State De­part­ment, a flip-flop that she jus­ti­fied with a rhet­or­ic­al wave of the hand. “I think it is im­per­at­ive that we look at the Key­stone pipeline as what I be­lieve it is—a dis­trac­tion from the im­port­ant work we have to do to com­bat cli­mate change.”

A dis­trac­tion from the im­port­ant work. That could be her cam­paign slo­gan.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; hillaryclinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 09/23/2015 10:10:55 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Woo hoo that is a hoot...moral authority? Where, on the planet, Zorton?


2 posted on 09/23/2015 10:13:16 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (1984 Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Come clean, THEN get out.


3 posted on 09/23/2015 10:13:34 AM PDT by beethovenfan (Islam is a cancer on civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
The following was posted here on 9/1/2015.
Drip, drip, drip....still being revealed.

1) Who transported Hillary’s server from NY to NJ? Did the Secret Service (who Hilary insists had been guarding it since it was really Bill’s Lie-Berry/Foundation asset) accompany and supervise the transport of the server? Per the interview with Platte River Networks, did they just take it, lock it up, not power it up, connect it to the internet, or not have it functioning as an active email server? Was there continuity of server activity between May 2013 to August 2015, or did the server go off-line starting in June 2013?

2) Who received actual server in NJ - the name of the Platte River Networks employee/technician? What WAS it - make/model/form factor, etc.? Did the Clinton Foundation (or issuer of the RFP on Hillary’s behalf) indicate that the company that would provide data services be qualified to handle national-security-level data?

3) In various interviews and reports, Platte River Networks repeatedly stated they were to “upgrade, manage, and secure” the server. What - specifically - does that mean?

4) What did Hillary’s RFP/contract instruct the data center to do specifically?

5) Does Platte River Networks have sufficient security clearance to handle this type of contract?

6) What were the firewall protocols in place at the time?

7) Who - by name - had access to the server, and the administrative authorization to wipe and cleanse the server? When was that done? Does “upgrade, manage, and secure” the server mean that Platte River Networks was given the task to remove all data from the server when it received it in June 2013?

8) Was malware or antivirus also on the server? Was the inherent firewall, virus protection, or operating system “upgraded, managed, and secured”? Any incidents reported such as DOS attack, hacking, etc.? What were they? How were they resolved?

9) Other than arranging for the server to be moved from NY to NJ, what was the Denver company contracted to do in relation to maintaining the server? What tangible evidence is there that the server arrived in functioning condition, was being used as an email server, was “upgraded, managed, and secured”, then wiped just prior to seizure by the FBI? Did Platte River Networks set up a “mirror” server, wipe out a dummy server, and send the zombie server to the FBI?

10) Were normal and regular backup procedures executed on the server, and where would the back ups be kept? If no backups were taken, was there a disaster recovery location? Where was that? If no backups and no disaster recovery, what was the plan if the equipment failed or found to have been wiped of any functionality?

11) Were any foreign nationals employed at Platte River Networks that had access to the Clinton server?

4 posted on 09/23/2015 10:14:46 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Come clean and turn yourself in!


5 posted on 09/23/2015 10:17:56 AM PDT by luvbach1 (We are finished. It will just take a while before everyone realizes it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Just get out.

I don’t really care what she has to say, and I’m really over her stand up comedian voice.


6 posted on 09/23/2015 10:18:27 AM PDT by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

come out or get clean....

.....nevermind


7 posted on 09/23/2015 10:19:34 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

None of the slack press has bothered to ask this:

If you didn’t traffic classified materials through your own server, where did you receive and send it?


8 posted on 09/23/2015 10:19:53 AM PDT by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Come clean or get out of the race.

Uh huh. Yeah. That’s what needs to happen. Sweep sweep sweep Benghazi under the rug. It’s all about lying about email, *that’s* the scandal.

This is the Uniparty protecting itself. They can not allow the truth about Benghazi to be exposed. Clinton must be sidelined. She will destroyed to whatever degree necessary. She can go quietly, now, or her legal problems will increase.


9 posted on 09/23/2015 10:21:17 AM PDT by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Why has no one asked if Hillary sent out memos to the various Dept heads, stating not to send her "sensitive" emails to her private email. ...how would they know not to?

Why has no one asked Hillary how she conducted "sensitive" State Dept business with various departments if not via email to her private server.

10 posted on 09/23/2015 10:22:07 AM PDT by TexasCajun (#BlackViolenceMatters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Ahmed's slightly older brother, Mohamed, removes the guts from one server, stuffs them into another server, and tells Hillary he just invented a secure email server. As soon as he gets back from hajj, he will visit Hillary in one of her 4 mansions as a reward.

11 posted on 09/23/2015 10:23:29 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Hillary, while the Secretary of State, had her own personally-funded spy operation in Libya when Qadaffi was still there.

Remember, this is a woman who is so cheap that she sold their dirty underwear for a tax write-off.

So, she is just going to spend her own money on a spy operation in Libya? When she can get the taxpayers to pay billions for spying operations in Libya?

Nope. No way.

She was looking for something that she didn’t want a lot of people to know she was looking for.

Qadaffi’s wealth and somebody to kill Qadaffi.

Our girl Hillary did some bad things with Libya and Qadaffi.

This isn’t about politics.

This is about the security of The United States and the prosecution of Hillary Clinton.

She will never confess.


12 posted on 09/23/2015 10:28:33 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

She will have to be dragged out with the fingers clinching the flooring.


13 posted on 09/23/2015 10:29:23 AM PDT by MAKOTHEDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Should be...

“Come clean AND get out”.


14 posted on 09/23/2015 10:29:51 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

When liberals like Fournier start calling for her to get out then it’s only a matter of time now.


15 posted on 09/23/2015 10:32:29 AM PDT by Bullish (Face it, insanity is just not presidential.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

Hillary! on Qadaffi: ‘We came, We saw, He died’ taking personal responsibility for the torture and death. Wow, and I thought Democrats were sooo compassionate! This woman stinks to high heaven.....how she arrived at where she is, is a complete mystery, except for the fact that Dems and their lying sock puppets in the Media, will cover for any Dem, every time.


16 posted on 09/23/2015 10:37:23 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan

Yes, “coming clean” would make “getting out” positively anti-climactic. There’d be nowhere else for her to go if she came clean.


17 posted on 09/23/2015 10:44:57 AM PDT by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan

Just die, Don’t tell the truth just die.


18 posted on 09/23/2015 10:47:23 AM PDT by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

When a ‘rat can no longer string along Ron Fornicaterer and the National Urinal... that ‘rat is not only dead, but stinking dead.


19 posted on 09/23/2015 10:49:32 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (There is no "allah" but satan, and mohammed was his demon-possessed tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I suspect that the treasure trove will be the Clinton Foundation “personal” emails that were deleted. You can bet dollars to donuts that she did not send 30,000 emails about Yoga classes while she was Secretary of State and her family was running the “Clinton Global Initiative”.

https://www.clintonfoundation.org/clinton-global-initiative


20 posted on 09/23/2015 10:50:35 AM PDT by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson