Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drones Armed With High-Energy Lasers May Arrive In 2017
Defense One ^ | September 23, 2015 | By Patrick Tucker

Posted on 09/23/2015 12:17:28 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee

General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc., or GA-ASI, the San Diego-based company that makes the Predator and Reaper drones, is undertaking a privately funded study to integrate a 150-kilowatt solid-state laser onto its Avenger (née Predator-C) drone. If the company succeeds, a drone with a high-energy laser will be a reality at some point in 2017, company executives told Defense One.

“We’re funded right now to develop a laser module compatible with the aircraft and study putting it on the Avenger,” Michael Perry, Vice President for Mission Systems at GA-ASI, told Defense One. “We hope to be funded to do that,” he said.

The company is far better known for its MQ-1s and MQ-9s — the backbones of the Pentagon’s drone strike force — than for its work with lasers. But in June, the company delivered a 150-kilowatt liquid laser to the Pentagon for extensive testing at the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico. For comparison, the 30 kw laser (output) currently on the Ponce in the Persian Gulf has more than enough output to destroy an enemy drone or blow a hole in a boat. The GA-ASI laser has 20 times the lethality of the one on the Ponce, with five times the power and four times the focus, according to Perry.

Bringing these two technologies together involves a lot more than strapping a laser cannon under the drone’s wings. Hitting a target with a laser mounted on a vibrating platform moving quickly through air laden with dust and water vapor is tougher than launching a Hellfire at a moving vehicle. . .

(Excerpt) Read more at defenseone.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 09/23/2015 12:17:28 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Just wow. Get that down to man-portable size and I’ll take one. Just the thing for fly season around here.


2 posted on 09/23/2015 12:21:49 PM PDT by Noumenon (Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Drones with freakin’ lasers on their heads!

Forget sharks.


3 posted on 09/23/2015 12:22:09 PM PDT by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon

4 posted on 09/23/2015 12:26:40 PM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled-...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Meh, drones with regular old guns and bombs are surely going to be more practical and versatile.

If lasers were in a usable state for warfare, we’d be putting them on all our ships and tanks first, not bothering with drones. This is a publicity stunt, I think, to drum up funding for more military laser research.


5 posted on 09/23/2015 12:28:43 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

I just love how these Popular Mechanix type articles gloss over minor issues like where does the power for this come from?


6 posted on 09/23/2015 12:31:40 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

Obama’s new military will be green, they will be solar... /sarc


7 posted on 09/23/2015 12:36:36 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

You have to ask???

Haha!

8 posted on 09/23/2015 12:38:13 PM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

9 posted on 09/23/2015 12:44:27 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon
Just remember to set to "stun" first.



10 posted on 09/23/2015 12:50:55 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Drones with guns and bombs are going to be more vulnerable. So are manned aircraft.


11 posted on 09/23/2015 12:53:42 PM PDT by Laserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

12 posted on 09/23/2015 12:56:06 PM PDT by Bobalu (See my freep page for political images.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

If lasers were in a usable state for warfare, we’d be putting them on all our ships and tanks first, not bothering with drones.

...

Go to the article. They have a video of a ship with a 30kw laser.


13 posted on 09/23/2015 12:56:41 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

I’d like to see the system used for surgical anti-personnel strikes. Fry a few goatf*****s and let the rest cower in fear....


14 posted on 09/23/2015 12:58:08 PM PDT by farming pharmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

I just love how these Popular Mechanix type articles gloss over minor issues like where does the power for this come from?

...

According to the article, rechargeable batteries. They can get off five to six shots on one charge. The system is being designed for a drone with a 3000 pound payload capacity.


15 posted on 09/23/2015 12:58:19 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
"Hitting a target with a laser mounted on a vibrating platform moving quickly through air laden with dust and water vapor is tougher than launching a Hellfire at a moving vehicle. . ."

Funny, I thought that we had long been using things like targeting pods on aircraft to designate ground targets for bombs and missiles.

16 posted on 09/23/2015 1:03:12 PM PDT by Kommodor (Terrorist, Journalist or Democrat? I can't tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Nah. I’d just go to the ‘Annihilate’ setting. Turn to 11.


17 posted on 09/23/2015 1:09:04 PM PDT by Noumenon (Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Yeah, one ship? I said all of our ships... one ship is still just a test case, not tech in a usable, deployable state.


18 posted on 09/23/2015 1:10:26 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
This is a publicity stunt, I think

Roger that. 150KW is a lot of power. What's going to generate it, or store it? That will weigh a fair bit, how will the drone get it, a laser, itself, and a fuel supply for itself in the air?

19 posted on 09/23/2015 1:12:52 PM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

We ARE putting them on our ships. And as for putting them on tanks... they are line of sight so it is better to have them in the air anyway. Also shooting a bunker with a laser is not as effective as shooting it with a cannon. Aircraft are not insulated with cement.


20 posted on 09/23/2015 1:14:10 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson