Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/01/2015 8:22:54 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: MarvinStinson

Blanchett-as-Mapes does a Sorkinesque heroic-liberal soliloquy, lecturing investigators and spitting out what the producers and writer hope will become iconic aphorisms.

As with all leftists, they believe that after lying, cheating and stealing they should be applauded as higher forms of beings.


2 posted on 10/01/2015 8:25:23 AM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

“Fake but accurate.”


4 posted on 10/01/2015 8:27:57 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

Liberal fantasy worlds operate like Stalin’s Soviet Union. People and facts disappear and are replaced with fabrications that then are distributed to newspapers, books, films, and official history. Bodyguards of Lies to advance the Left’s agenda.


6 posted on 10/01/2015 8:34:12 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68; If You Want It Fixed - Fix It; headstamp 2; blueunicorn6; I want the USA back; Airwinger; ..

“Truth” makes it appear that the documents’ contents were verified by a senior officer in Bush’s unit, Gen. Bobby Hodges. Mapes is seen reading the documents over the phone to him, and Hodges agrees that they accurately reflected the mindset of Bush’s late commander, Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, whose signature is on the documents.

That, in reality, did not happen — at least according to Hodges: He was not told that the accuracy of the documents was in dispute, and essentially said, “If Killian wrote that, that’s what he felt,” noted Megan McArdle (an Obama voter) in an analysis of the case on Bloomberg View.

Hodges took extensive notes of the interview at the time, and some of the things Mapes would claim they discussed did not turn up in his version of the chat. (In the movie, Hodges is later shown objecting to being described in the media as Mapes’ trump card — but doesn’t deny having provided backing to Mapes’ story.)

In the film’s most climactic scene, Blanchett is forced to explain herself to a CBS-appointed fact-finding committee headed by Dick Thornburgh, who had served as attorney general under the first President Bush. She gives an impassioned defense of her work in a speech meant to make the audience stand up and cheer — but instead comes across as obtuse to the point of being self-delusional.

Blanchett’s Mapes tells the committee that the documents had to be genuine because they contain military acronyms and jargon and show knowledge of Bush’s military service (which had been extensively covered in the media). It beggars belief, she claims, that anyone could go through so much trouble and then produce fake documents using Microsoft Word.

She even insists she’s been persecuted for her political leanings (though she won’t admit to any): “You mean, am I now or have I ever been a liberal?” she asks the committee.

At one point she declares, “Our story was about whether the president fulfilled his service. Nobody wants to talk about that. They want to talk about fonts and forgeries, and they hope to God the truth gets lost in the scrum!”

Except Mapes couldn’t prove the president went AWOL without the documents.

Eight people, including Mapes, Rather and three CBS execs, lost their jobs over the scandal. As Kevin Drum wrote in Washington Monthly after the committee report was released, “It’s a train wreck. A complete disaster. You have to read the whole report to get the full flavor, but the nickel version is simple: It’s unbelievable that this ‘60 Minutes’ segment ever got on the air.”

Another climactic moment near the end comes when Topher Grace’s researcher character, having been fired by CBS, gives a similarly long and angry speech about how CBS and its then-corporate owner Viacom are simply doing the handiwork of its allies in the Bush administration because of Viacom’s interests involving FCC rules.

That speech is equally nutty: It raises the question of why CBS would have allowed the story — or any other anti-Bush stories — to run in the first place. Mapes won a Peabody for her reporting that same year on the Abu Ghraib scandal.


7 posted on 10/01/2015 8:35:02 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

For postmodernist libtards, it is the narrative that matters, not truth


8 posted on 10/01/2015 8:35:23 AM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

Out of all the excellent technical analysis on this site that helped uncover that hoax, the one that convinced me the most quickly, and enabled me to convince even my most liberal friends, was a guy who said just open a new document in MS Word and don’t change any settings. Type the letter and only hit return at the end of a paragraph. Compare. He then posted a gif showing this result alternating with the CBS news website posted copy of the “document”. It was a 100% perfect match. After that, anyone who has any doubt about the fact that this was a blatant hoax is not even worth discussing, let alone debating.


9 posted on 10/01/2015 8:36:48 AM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson
Here are a couple of relevant FR links:

Dan Rather's Revenge and the Battle for Free Speech

Rather's Ruin and the Rise of the Pajamahadeen

11 posted on 10/01/2015 8:38:00 AM PDT by Interesting Times (WinterSoldier.com. SwiftVets.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson
Wacko Dan Rather movie still insists forged Bush-National Guard documents were real

You fools..I've already pre-purchased my ticket for the opening day...


13 posted on 10/01/2015 8:38:57 AM PDT by BerniesFriend (I am BerniesFriend, however it's really Bernadette, NOT Bernie Sanders friend!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

Did this movie go straight to DVD? Was it for DNC consumption? I was awol a couple of times, it didn’t stop me from succeeding in my career. All I got was a no weekend pass and restriction to quarters. However the XO slipped me my pass when the CO left for the weekend. OMG, if I ran as a Republican and the DNC found that out, I’d never win the election. LOL. So simple minded news people, how did they ever get those jobs? No one ever brings up the fact that Nixon cut short the NG obligation or the fact that ETs could be performed at any other Guard Unit for attendance purposes, if they are not within their units home station. There is also make up drills, where a member can report to his unit on a day not listed as a drill date. Too make a movie out of this and eliminating the real facts just makes it a propaganda film for dupes.


20 posted on 10/01/2015 8:47:33 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (In the words of Oliver Hardy; "Another fine mess you have gotten us into.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

I can get you genuine documents on GW Bush saying whatever you want to say ...just give me a few days.


21 posted on 10/01/2015 8:47:45 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson
No wonder.

The same people think the birth certificate Barack Obama produced is real.


25 posted on 10/01/2015 8:52:08 AM PDT by Iron Munro (Proverbs 21:20 - The wise have stores of food and oil but a foolish man devours all he has))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

“I believe you can be an honest person and lie about any number of things.” — Dan Rather on The O’Reilly Factor, May 15, 2001


26 posted on 10/01/2015 8:53:03 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3343303/posts


27 posted on 10/01/2015 8:53:37 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson
I plead guilty to making the following bad prediction on the "Pajamahadeen" thread in 2007:

...

Wonder who will star in the movie?

Probably not Robert Redford...

32 posted on 10/01/2015 9:03:47 AM PDT by Interesting Times (WinterSoldier.com. SwiftVets.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

Wow, those were the days on Free Republic.

We ... well not me but ... took down Dan Rather.

Hey, Jim, if we do nothing else ...


38 posted on 10/01/2015 9:09:43 AM PDT by altura (Cruz for our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

BTW, Rather’s daughter was an official of the Dhimmicrap Party in the very county where Burkett lived and Rather spoke to the county committee (and met Burkett.)


39 posted on 10/01/2015 9:11:02 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

Real faked documents. I guess that makes sense. LOL!


40 posted on 10/01/2015 9:14:35 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Normal people don't vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

Imagine if conservatives could dictate what Hollywood puts out.


42 posted on 10/01/2015 9:16:33 AM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

The forged documents ARE real. They are not imaginary. They are genuine forged documents. Fake forged documents? How?


43 posted on 10/01/2015 9:18:07 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

I guess certain members of the FR will not be in the movie. History ignored.


62 posted on 10/01/2015 10:04:11 AM PDT by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson