Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Slyfox

They are no longer even trying to be discreet about it.

http://thehill.com/regulation/244620-obamas-bid-to-diversify-wealthy-neighborhoods

SCOTUS cleared the way for them by ruling last session that they could use “disparate impact” to pursue discrimination claims.


12 posted on 10/02/2015 1:58:57 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Buckeye McFrog
“This rule is not about forcing anyone to live anywhere they don’t want to,” said Margery Turner, senior vice president at the left-leaning Urban Institute. “It’s really about addressing long-standing practices that prevent people from living where they want to.”

People who live where they want without working for it are known as "squatters."

I have a friend who used to live in Johannesburg, South Africa. She woke up one morning with a family camped in her backyard using their water hose. She and her husband were able to run them off but what if the Feds said that you legally could not run them off?

Sounds like we are heading in that direction.

If it is elitist for me to work hard to be able to live in a nice area where other people take care of the lawns and their houses, then call me an elitist.

19 posted on 10/03/2015 6:09:51 AM PDT by Slyfox (Will no one rid us of this meddlesome president?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson