Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg

Your comment about Mobile and New Orleans raises an interesting point. I’ve always assumed that the growth of commerce on the Mississippi River system played a much bigger role in the Civil War than most people realize. The U.S. could not have expanded the way it did if the Union states in the Midwest and (later) the Great Plains could not transport freight freely up and down the Mississippi River.


105 posted on 10/03/2015 3:39:51 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
Your comment about Mobile and New Orleans raises an interesting point. I’ve always assumed that the growth of commerce on the Mississippi River system played a much bigger role in the Civil War than most people realize.

Rivers were still the easiest way to move goods in bulk at the time. New Orleans was the logical point of export for cotton and other agricultural goods grown in Mississippi, Tennessee, Arkansas and Louisiana. Mobile handled Alabama.

108 posted on 10/03/2015 3:44:04 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson