Posted on 10/06/2015 3:22:51 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
He was incredibly good. Gave specifics, was strong, was presidential.
And what energy!
I will post a video when it hits youtube.
He didn't "walk away" from his attempt to use eminent domain, he got smacked down in court and prevented from using eminent domain. And it's not a private businessman's prerogative to "let" someone stay in her home. And that wasn't the only time he used eminent domain. And he very publicly supports it's use for private development.
What exactly have the “true conservatives” in congress accomplished?
Obamacare scrapped? Illegals deported? Wall built? Anchor babies outlawed? National debt reduced? Abortion restricted? China trade deficit reduced? Food stamp growth curbed? Welfare growth reduced?
If Trump can deliver any 3 of above, he is more than enough conservative for me and most rational people.
Trump is conservative on these issues:
Pro life since at least 2011, wanted to ban partial birth abortion as far back as 2000.
Pro Traditional marriage. "Gay rights is not my thing."
Pro capital punishment "Capital punishment isn't uncivilized; murderers living is"
Hold Judges accountable
Opposes "Common core is a disaster" Teach citizenship, quit "dumbing down".
Anti education unions (2000)
For school choice
"Climate Change is a hoax"
"No Cap-and-Tax"
For drilling our own.
On Environment "Good development enhances the environment"
Stressed the importance of a strong family & culture of life (2015)
Supports Israel
Opposes Iran deal and letting Iran obtain the bomb.
Wants to crush ISIS quickly.
Wants a military so strong no one will challenge us.
Against unbalanced trade deals that kill American jobs.
Against warrant-less government surveillance of citizens.
Is against having a high national debt. Warns that $24T is a point of no return.
Against gun control
For assault weapon ban but says the AR-15 shouldn't be considered an assault weapon.
Wants to repeal Obamacare and replace it with market driven polices and increased competition among insurance companies.
Wants to increase military spending.
Will close the border to illegals
Will send the criminals and sponges back.
Will deport all illegals but will let the hard working ones go through the legal process to come back.
Against Anchor babies
Knows unemployment is much higher than official stats.
Will bring jobs back through better trade negotiation.
Attended military academy and Wharton Business School.
Stood up for Birthers and challenged Obama on his fraud. Believes USA is "the greatest force for freedom the world has ever known"
Wants to honor commitments on Social Security and Medicare, which we can afford to do if he gets the economy going full steam.
Wants to reduce the fraud in disability and other programs.
Against marriage penalties in tax code.
Wants to simplify tax code with just 3 simple brackets.
Wants to reduce income taxes and eliminate corporate tax.
Wants to rebuld our infrastructure.
Wants to apply welfare-to-work to 76 other welfare programs (2011)
Doesn't have time for political correctness.
Not afraid to call out either party or both when they are wrong.
Not a puppet to rich campaign donors.
Pull your panties out of your crack and settle down.
What part of "public use" don't you understand. Using eminent domain for highways and other public infrastructure projects is fine, and Constitutionally permissible. Using it to allow Trump to build a limousine parking lot, not so much.
Regarding eminent domain, hold outs and Ms. Vera Coking, below are the facts that support Trump. Bottom line Coking was offered millions of dollars for her house. She ended up getting $595,000. There were three hold outs in total. The other two hold outs collected $2.1 and $1.9 million. You didn't hear these facts from the panel. Boy am I disappointed. And these two guys are supposed be on our side.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vera_Coking
ttp://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/22/nyregion/a-homeowner-who-refused-to-cash-out-in-a-gambling-town-may-have-missed-her-chance.html?_r=0
Hillary, is that you?
KNOCK IT OFF!
“You can’t reason with the TrumpBots. If Trump says it, then it is right. No debate allowed”.
I agree and I’m for Trump.
But I think you should have said “most TrumpBots”.
The silent majority speaks video was great...it was cool to see folks from all different walks expressing their support for trump. They got the msm figured out as well as FR does.
Stop acting childish and behave like a man/woman what ever you presently claim to be. So you have no debating skills!
When a tiny house sits in the middle of a huge municipal development because the owner wants to live in the past. When all around this little house is a huge development. And the only reason this parcel is holding out is MONEY.
Yeah, I get it.
Sorry your tiny farm was overrun by a shopping mall. Take your HUGE check and buy an new frikken farm.
Send the information in to Bret. He’s on Facebook, Twitter and has email. He’s only Fox head I’ve had respond ( more than once)
“You can’t reason with the TrumpBots. If Trump says it, then it is right. No debate allowed.”
You really believe that? I have a challenge for you. Go on the right thread and just recount Cruz’s votes on TPA and the Corker bill. That is, if you really want to see mindlessness.
In other words, it was an example where the current system works and whether or not property can be taken went to court and it was settled.
But you're complaining that Trump supports the current system?
And that wasn't the only time he used eminent domain.
Really? Can you cite any other time he used it?
Here’s today’s interview for everyone to send to their lists:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGRyHjheoq0
Red...you are the greatest! Much luv, Rooster.
Look forward to your video link...missed the first air time. Thanks
O.K. PRAY for Jeb.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.