Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek

I loved the Pregnant Pauses!!

just stunning!

97 percent are warmers???


5 posted on 10/06/2015 6:53:06 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: MeshugeMikey

And he’s so calm about it. LOL


7 posted on 10/06/2015 7:01:55 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: MeshugeMikey

I wish Cruz would have taken the opportunity to rip open just how they came about that 97% bs.

From seeing a local Sierra Club rep argue before a zoning board in favor of wind turbines, they seem to have nothing but a small list of talking points that they defer to for every question.

They know the words, but they have no clue what they mean.


17 posted on 10/06/2015 7:10:59 PM PDT by digger48 (ars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: MeshugeMikey

{”97 percent are warmers???”}

That appears to be correct. It’s not surprising. My friend is a biologist and has a son who is a physicist working for a genome sequencing company.

Let me say, both are atheists, both are politically liberal. Both support the man-made climate change premise and have no interest in considering contrary evidence.


18 posted on 10/06/2015 7:11:14 PM PDT by Calpublican (Republican Party Now Stands for Nothing!!!!!(Except Conniving))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: MeshugeMikey

Have you ever looked at the history of where the 97% number comes from? It’s an entertaining waste of time. Needless to say it’s totally contrived and complete bs.


19 posted on 10/06/2015 7:12:24 PM PDT by CA_soon_gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: MeshugeMikey
97 percent are warmers???

It's probably not nearly that high.

The 97% figure is made up of a combination of people who really, truly believe in Global Warming, those who believe in it because it pays their bills and those who are unwilling to risk professional and personal destruction by opposing it ... or just adopting a neutral stance.
23 posted on 10/06/2015 7:16:56 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: MeshugeMikey

Ted needed to add that science is not and has never been a
a “consensus” of opinions of scientists as a basis for a scientific claim. It needs to be repeatable experimental outcome. Not... a collection of disparate databases collaged together to make a script of man caused global warming.


44 posted on 10/06/2015 7:28:05 PM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: MeshugeMikey
97 percent are warmers???

Those who do NOT adhere to anthropogenic global warming are not considered to be scientists in the field.
72 posted on 10/06/2015 7:52:55 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: MeshugeMikey

It is amazing that after all the exposure about the phony 97% allegation, that is the best this lame ass can come up with. Maybe he thinks anyone who disagrees with him can be called racist in subsequent interviews.


77 posted on 10/06/2015 7:57:10 PM PDT by Baynative (Liberty lost is a high price to pay for the experiment of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: MeshugeMikey

97% = like 78 out of 81 selected scientists. It’s definitely
NOT 97% of thousands of scientists. The 97
% number is a SCAM, just like CAGW.


87 posted on 10/06/2015 8:07:22 PM PDT by Paladin2 (my non desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: MeshugeMikey

97% of what scientists? “The scientists” means nothing.

Having worked with research scientists my whole career, I would venture to say it is not easy to get scientists to all agree on much of anything. This is especially true when data contradicts a conclusion.

These idiots are all in for a global government ruling over all the nations of the world. Since they are going for global control over the means of production (energy) of the globes economies, I would say it is a Marxist grab for centralized global power. Given what we have seen of Marxist governments, how dangerous would that be for humanity?

Are these people stupid or evil?


110 posted on 10/06/2015 9:32:42 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson