You are even more pathetic that the first guy.
Both of you spend all your time pissing on Reagan’s legacy as only Democrat trolls would, chucking stones at people who are actually trying to do something other than sit in their pajamas behind a keyboard; Reagan gave good advice on how to campaign and it wasn’t instructing conservatives to chuck stones like a bunch of muslim fanatics who wonder why no one wants to convert to their ‘perfect’ religion.
One of the best things about conservatives - usually- is that instead of tearing down they build up; meanwhile one of the best indicators that a person is a leftist is that they tear down and don’t build up. So, promote your candidate, if you have one, but I suspect whoever it is would probably prefer people who can articulate his ideas instead of fling feces.
One of the best things about conservatives - usually- is that instead of tearing down they build up”
You are so entirely spot on here.
And in many other contexts - especially church life/theology but also just generally interacting with culture (including the fine arts) - I have really made this my implicit life goal, and I have become basically out of patience for those that find fault and criticize everything. I am not sure I have every articulated it to myself that crisply, but what you say there, is really spot on, and at least for me, words to live by!
This article is about Carson, so it is entirely appropriate for me to comment on Carson. And Reagan had no problem explaining why he was a better candidate than Ford or Bush or whomever.
If you think Carson is actually a qualified, conservative candidate, maybe you should look at who’s the pathetic poster here.
Oh, look, for all your sanctimony, it appears you’ve called another GOP candidate in this race a “landgrabbing narcissist” just yesterday.